Worsnick Sarah A, Sharma Parikshit S, Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi
Geisinger Heart Institute, Wilkes Barre, PA, USA.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 May 15;9(5):3137-3146. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090501. eCollection 2018 May.
The right ventricular (RV) apex has been considered to be the primary site for ventricular lead implantation since the original descriptions of permanent pacing. However, long-term RV apical pacing has been shown to have negative effects on ventricular function and hemodynamics as a result of ventricular dyssynchrony. Alternative sites of ventricular pacing, particularly the RV septum and His bundle, have been evaluated for patients with a need for long-term ventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on the use of these alternative sites for RV pacing.
自永久性起搏首次被描述以来,右心室(RV)心尖一直被认为是心室导线植入的主要部位。然而,长期的RV心尖起搏已被证明,由于心室不同步,会对心室功能和血流动力学产生负面影响。对于需要长期心室起搏的患者,已经对心室起搏的替代部位进行了评估,特别是RV间隔和希氏束。在本文中,我们回顾了关于使用这些RV起搏替代部位的现有数据。