Haq Ihtisham, Shakeel Osama, Amjad Awais, Ullah Faizan, Ali Hannan, Jamal Aun, Khattak Shahid, Syed Aamir Ali
Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, PAK.
Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Cureus. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7932.
Objective The objective of the study is to investigate the benefits of pathological assessment of donuts removed during coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Methodology During three years, 220 patients underwent circular stapled anastomosis. It is a retrospective study with convenient sampling. Involvement of donuts, the involvement of margins, length of donuts, and margins were primarily recorded. Ethical review approval was taken from the Institutional Review Board. Hospital electronic system was used to retrieve the data. Results Two hundred and twenty patients underwent circular end to end anastomosis (CEEA) stapled gun anastomosis. All had adenocarcinoma. Most of the patients had T3 disease (n=113). Low anterior resection was the most common procedure followed by anterior resection and sigmoid colectomy, respectively. We performed all rectal cancers anastomosis with a circular stapling gun. On histological analyses among 220 patients, only two patients were found to have a positive distal donut. No proximal donuts were positive. Both patients were also found to have positive distal margins. The mean length of the proximal donut was 1.79±0.45 cm. The mean length of the distal donut was 1.68±0.48 cm. Two distal margins and none of the proximal margins were positive for cancer. The mean length of the proximal margin was 8.69±4.48 cm. The mean length of the distal margin was 4.9±5.98 cm. Both patients had already received six months of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy and were not offered any additional treatment. Both patients were kept on close surveillance. Conclusion Routine analyses of the donuts after anterior resection has no impact on the management and outcome of the disease.
目的 本研究的目的是探讨前切除术结肠肛管吻合术中切除的“标本圈”病理评估的益处。方法 在三年期间,220例患者接受了圆形吻合器吻合术。这是一项采用方便抽样的回顾性研究。主要记录“标本圈”的受累情况、切缘受累情况、“标本圈”长度和切缘长度。获得了机构审查委员会的伦理审查批准。使用医院电子系统检索数据。结果 220例患者接受了圆形端端吻合术(CEEA)吻合器吻合。所有患者均患有腺癌。大多数患者患有T3期疾病(n = 113)。低位前切除术是最常见的手术方式,其次分别是前切除术和乙状结肠切除术。我们对所有直肠癌均使用圆形吻合器进行吻合。在220例患者的组织学分析中,仅发现2例患者的远切端“标本圈”呈阳性。近切端“标本圈”均无阳性。这2例患者的远切缘也均呈阳性。近切端“标本圈”的平均长度为1.79±0.45 cm。远切端“标本圈”的平均长度为1.68±0.48 cm。2例患者的远切缘呈癌阳性,近切缘均无癌阳性。近切缘的平均长度为8.69±4.48 cm。远切缘的平均长度为4.9±5.98 cm。这2例患者均已接受了6个月的术前放化疗,未给予任何额外治疗。对这2例患者进行密切监测。结论 前切除术后对“标本圈”进行常规分析对疾病的管理和结局没有影响。