Blum Arlene, Behl Mamta, Birnbaum Linda, Diamond Miriam L, Phillips Allison, Singla Veena, Sipes Nisha S, Stapleton Heather M, Venier Marta
Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, CA, 94709, and Department of Chemistry, UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94705.
National Toxicology Program, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019 Nov 12;6(11):638-649. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
As the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and the entire class of organohalogen flame retardants, is declining, the use of organophosphate esters flame retardants (OPFRs) is increasing. In this paper, we ask whether OPFRs are a better choice than PBDEs. To address this question, we compared OPFRs with PBDEs for a wide range of properties. OPFRs exposure is ubiquitous in people and in outdoor and indoor environments, and are now often found at higher levels compared to PBDE peak exposure levels. Furthermore, data from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments all suggest that there are health concerns at current exposure levels for both halogenated and non-halogenated OPFRs. Obtaining the scientific evidence needed for regulation of OPFRs can take many years. Given the large number of OPFRs in use, manufacturers can move towards healthier and safer products by developing innovative ways to reduce fire hazard for electronics enclosures, upholstered furniture, building materials and other consumer products without adding flame retardant chemicals.
随着多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)以及整个有机卤素阻燃剂类别的使用量在下降,有机磷酸酯阻燃剂(OPFRs)的使用量却在增加。在本文中,我们探讨OPFRs是否比PBDEs是更好的选择。为回答这个问题,我们在广泛的特性方面对OPFRs和PBDEs进行了比较。OPFRs在人群以及室外和室内环境中普遍存在,并且与PBDEs的峰值暴露水平相比,现在其含量往往更高。此外,来自毒性测试、流行病学研究和风险评估的数据均表明,目前卤化和非卤化OPFRs的暴露水平均存在健康问题。获取监管OPFRs所需的科学证据可能需要很多年。鉴于使用中的OPFRs数量众多,制造商可以通过开发创新方法来降低电子外壳、软垫家具、建筑材料和其他消费品的火灾隐患,而不添加阻燃化学品,从而转向更健康、更安全的产品。