Suppr超能文献

呼吸危害:有机磷酸酯类阻燃剂对健康的不良影响之透视

Breathing hazards: Perspective on the adverse health effects of organophosphate flame retardants.

作者信息

Solan Megan E, Goetzinger Emma G, Sampath Vanitha, Park Jin-Ah

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater Adv. 2025 May;18. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100744. Epub 2025 May 8.

Abstract

Since the 1970s, flame retardants have been applied to consumer and industrial products to prevent combustion and the spread of fires, with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) being the most prevalent. However, due to environmental and human health concerns, the use of PBDEs was phased out and nearly eliminated by the early 2000s. As a safer alternative to PBDEs, organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) were proposed as they were believed to have a shorter half-life and increased degradation rate compared to PBDEs. OPFRs are widely used in consumer products, including electronics, textiles, and car interiors. The dusts produced from product usage results in OPFR exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption. Despite dusts being a major exposure source, the effects of inhalation and subsequent effects on lung health remain understudied. A few studies have demonstrated lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness as consequences of OPFR inhalation exposure and these findings are supported by studies. However, significant gaps remain in our understanding of OPFR exposure and the implications for public health. Conducting additional epidemiological studies, alongside studies and the development of PBPK/TK models, can significantly enhance the power of hazard assessment for inhalation exposure in humans. This review article discusses the sources and routes of exposure to OPFRs and their adverse health effects, emphasizing inhalation toxicology. Furthermore, we identify critical gaps in current knowledge regarding the health risks posed by OPFRs and propose future research directions to explore their adverse environmental and human health consequences.

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,阻燃剂已应用于消费品和工业产品中,以防止燃烧和火灾蔓延,其中多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)最为普遍。然而,由于环境和人类健康问题,多溴二苯醚的使用在21世纪初被逐步淘汰并几乎被消除。作为多溴二苯醚的一种更安全替代品,有机磷酸酯阻燃剂(OPFRs)被提出,因为人们认为它们的半衰期较短,与多溴二苯醚相比降解速度更快。有机磷酸酯阻燃剂广泛应用于消费品中,包括电子产品、纺织品和汽车内饰。产品使用过程中产生的灰尘会通过吸入、摄入和皮肤吸收导致有机磷酸酯阻燃剂暴露。尽管灰尘是主要的暴露源,但吸入的影响以及随后对肺部健康的影响仍未得到充分研究。一些研究已经证明,吸入有机磷酸酯阻燃剂会导致肺部炎症和气道高反应性,这些发现得到了其他研究的支持。然而,我们对有机磷酸酯阻燃剂暴露及其对公众健康的影响的理解仍存在重大差距。开展更多的流行病学研究,以及毒理学研究和开发生理药代动力学/毒代动力学(PBPK/TK)模型,可以显著提高对人类吸入暴露危害评估的能力。这篇综述文章讨论了有机磷酸酯阻燃剂的暴露来源和途径及其对健康的不良影响,重点强调吸入毒理学。此外,我们确定了当前关于有机磷酸酯阻燃剂所带来的健康风险的知识中的关键差距,并提出了未来的研究方向,以探索它们对环境和人类健康的不良后果。

相似文献

9
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.

本文引用的文献

10
Global patterns of human exposure to flame retardants indoors.全球室内人体接触阻燃剂的模式。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169393. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169393. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验