• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breathing hazards: Perspective on the adverse health effects of organophosphate flame retardants.呼吸危害:有机磷酸酯类阻燃剂对健康的不良影响之透视
J Hazard Mater Adv. 2025 May;18. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100744. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
From e-waste to living space: Flame retardants contaminating household items add to concern about plastic recycling.从电子垃圾到生活空间:污染家居用品的阻燃剂增加了对塑料回收的担忧。
Chemosphere. 2024 Oct;365:143319. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143319. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
High levels of flame retardants in vehicle dust indicate ongoing use of brominated and organophosphate flame retardants in vehicle interiors.车辆灰尘中高含量的阻燃剂表明车辆内部仍在使用溴化阻燃剂和有机磷酸酯阻燃剂。
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Mar 15;197(4):396. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-13822-z.
2
Comparison of indoor and outdoor atmospheric organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) from the petrochemical industrial area in North China: Occurrence, gas-PM distribution, source appointment and health implications.中国北方石化工业区室内外大气中有机磷阻燃剂(OPFRs)的比较:存在情况、气态-颗粒物分布、源解析及健康影响
Environ Pollut. 2025 Feb 15;367:125529. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125529. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Urinary Concentrations of Organophosphate Flame-Retardant Metabolites in the US Population.美国人群尿液中有机磷阻燃剂代谢物浓度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435484. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35484.
4
Association between exposure to organophosphate flame retardants and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in lung cancer patients.接触有机磷阻燃剂与肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体表达的关系。
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Aug;15(24):1805-1814. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15411. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Integrated Approach for Testing and Assessment for Developmental Neurotoxicity (DNT) to Prioritize Aromatic Organophosphorus Flame Retardants.用于发育神经毒性(DNT)测试和评估以对芳香族有机磷阻燃剂进行优先级排序的综合方法。
Toxics. 2024 Jun 18;12(6):437. doi: 10.3390/toxics12060437.
6
Increasing frequency and intensity of the most extreme wildfires on Earth.地球上最极端野火的发生频率和强度不断增加。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug;8(8):1420-1425. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02452-2. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
Organophosphate esters in water and air: A minireview of their sources, occurrence, and air-water exchange.水中和空气中的有机磷酸酯:其来源、存在和空气-水交换的简要综述。
Chemosphere. 2024 May;356:141874. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141874. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
8
Relationship between flame retardants and respiratory health- A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.阻燃剂与呼吸健康的关系——观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Environ Pollut. 2024 Apr 15;347:123733. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123733. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Physiologically based toxicokinetic modelling of Tri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) in mice accounting for multiple exposure routes.考虑多种暴露途径的三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)在小鼠体内的基于生理学的毒代动力学建模。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Feb;271:115976. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.115976. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
10
Global patterns of human exposure to flame retardants indoors.全球室内人体接触阻燃剂的模式。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169393. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169393. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

呼吸危害:有机磷酸酯类阻燃剂对健康的不良影响之透视

Breathing hazards: Perspective on the adverse health effects of organophosphate flame retardants.

作者信息

Solan Megan E, Goetzinger Emma G, Sampath Vanitha, Park Jin-Ah

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater Adv. 2025 May;18. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100744. Epub 2025 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100744
PMID:40657420
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252992/
Abstract

Since the 1970s, flame retardants have been applied to consumer and industrial products to prevent combustion and the spread of fires, with polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) being the most prevalent. However, due to environmental and human health concerns, the use of PBDEs was phased out and nearly eliminated by the early 2000s. As a safer alternative to PBDEs, organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) were proposed as they were believed to have a shorter half-life and increased degradation rate compared to PBDEs. OPFRs are widely used in consumer products, including electronics, textiles, and car interiors. The dusts produced from product usage results in OPFR exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption. Despite dusts being a major exposure source, the effects of inhalation and subsequent effects on lung health remain understudied. A few studies have demonstrated lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness as consequences of OPFR inhalation exposure and these findings are supported by studies. However, significant gaps remain in our understanding of OPFR exposure and the implications for public health. Conducting additional epidemiological studies, alongside studies and the development of PBPK/TK models, can significantly enhance the power of hazard assessment for inhalation exposure in humans. This review article discusses the sources and routes of exposure to OPFRs and their adverse health effects, emphasizing inhalation toxicology. Furthermore, we identify critical gaps in current knowledge regarding the health risks posed by OPFRs and propose future research directions to explore their adverse environmental and human health consequences.

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,阻燃剂已应用于消费品和工业产品中,以防止燃烧和火灾蔓延,其中多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)最为普遍。然而,由于环境和人类健康问题,多溴二苯醚的使用在21世纪初被逐步淘汰并几乎被消除。作为多溴二苯醚的一种更安全替代品,有机磷酸酯阻燃剂(OPFRs)被提出,因为人们认为它们的半衰期较短,与多溴二苯醚相比降解速度更快。有机磷酸酯阻燃剂广泛应用于消费品中,包括电子产品、纺织品和汽车内饰。产品使用过程中产生的灰尘会通过吸入、摄入和皮肤吸收导致有机磷酸酯阻燃剂暴露。尽管灰尘是主要的暴露源,但吸入的影响以及随后对肺部健康的影响仍未得到充分研究。一些研究已经证明,吸入有机磷酸酯阻燃剂会导致肺部炎症和气道高反应性,这些发现得到了其他研究的支持。然而,我们对有机磷酸酯阻燃剂暴露及其对公众健康的影响的理解仍存在重大差距。开展更多的流行病学研究,以及毒理学研究和开发生理药代动力学/毒代动力学(PBPK/TK)模型,可以显著提高对人类吸入暴露危害评估的能力。这篇综述文章讨论了有机磷酸酯阻燃剂的暴露来源和途径及其对健康的不良影响,重点强调吸入毒理学。此外,我们确定了当前关于有机磷酸酯阻燃剂所带来的健康风险的知识中的关键差距,并提出了未来的研究方向,以探索它们对环境和人类健康的不良后果。