Department of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Neuroradiology. 2020 Oct;62(10):1323-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02458-0. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO); to propose a newly modified radiographic classification of ICAO that can rigorously identify suitable candidates for endovascular ICAO treatment.
We included 42 consecutive patients who had ICAO with ischaemic symptoms refractory to medical therapy. We examined the symptomatology, complications, follow-up results and radiographic images of ICAO receiving attempted endovascular treatment. We attempted to stratify all radiographic images into categories based on morphological occlusion patterns, occlusion segments and distal ICA reconstitution on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Four types (A-D) of radiographic ICAO were identified. We redefined type B as having a tapered stump but no distal lumen. The rate of successful recanalization was 83.33% (35/42 ICAOs; type A, 18/20; type B, 7/10; type C, 10/11; type D, 0/1). The perioperative complication rate was 11.90% (5/42), including 3 asymptomatic distal embolisms, 1 symptomatic cerebral infarction and 1 asymptomatic carotid artery dissection. None of these technique-related complications led to severe neurological damage or death. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores after 1-20 months of follow-up were significantly decreased in successfully revascularized patients (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in mRS scores in the 7 patients in whom recanalization failed (P > 0.05).
Endovascular recanalization seems to achieve technical success and clinical improvement for symptomatic subacute and chronic ICAO. Additionally, our newly modified radiographic classification of ICAO may be valuable in assessing the technical feasibility and safety of procedures in symptomatic ICAO patients.
评估血管内再通治疗症状性亚急性和慢性颈内动脉闭塞(ICAO)的可行性和安全性;提出一种新的改良的 ICAO 放射学分类,可严格识别适合血管内 ICAO 治疗的患者。
我们纳入了 42 例 ICAO 伴缺血症状且对药物治疗无反应的连续患者。我们检查了接受尝试性血管内治疗的 ICAO 的症状、并发症、随访结果和放射学图像。我们试图根据形态闭塞模式、闭塞段和数字减影血管造影(DSA)上的远端颈内动脉再形成,将所有放射学图像分类。
确定了 4 种(A-D)类型的 ICAO 放射学分类。我们将 B 型重新定义为具有锥形残端但无远端管腔。再通成功率为 83.33%(42 个 ICAO 中有 35 个;A 型 18/20,B 型 7/10,C 型 10/11,D 型 0/1)。围手术期并发症发生率为 11.90%(5/42),包括 3 例无症状远端栓塞、1 例症状性脑梗死和 1 例无症状颈内动脉夹层。这些与技术相关的并发症均未导致严重的神经损伤或死亡。成功再通患者的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分在 1-20 个月的随访后显著降低(P<0.001)。7 例再通失败的患者 mRS 评分无显著变化(P>0.05)。
血管内再通似乎对症状性亚急性和慢性 ICAO 可实现技术成功和临床改善。此外,我们新的改良的 ICAO 放射学分类可能对评估症状性 ICAO 患者的手术技术可行性和安全性有价值。