• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性慢性颈内动脉闭塞的血管内再通:改良血管造影分类及临床结果的建议。

Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: proposal of a modified angiographic classification and clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing 211166, China.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;233:107935. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107935. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107935
PMID:37573678
Abstract

PURPOSE

To stratify angiographic images of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) into a newly modified angiographic classification, and identify suitable candidates for endovascular recanalization.

METHODS

This study included 51 consecutive patients with symptomatic CICAO who underwent endovascular recanalization at our institution. Patients' clinical information, angiographic findings, procedural results, and outcomes were recorded. We attempted to stratify all angiographic images into categories based on morphological occlusive patterns and distal internal carotid artery (ICA) lumen reconstitution on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

RESULTS

Four types (I-IV) of CICAO were identified based on angiographic characteristics. We defined type I as having a tapered (IA) or blunt stump (IB) and distal ICA lumen reconstitution with collateral filling; type II as having no stump but with distal ICA lumen reconstitution; type III as having a tapered (IIIA) or blunt stump (IIIB) but no distal ICA lumen reconstitution; type IV as having no stump and no distal ICA lumen reconstitution. The rate of successful recanalization was 90.3 % for type I, 60.0 % for type II, 50.0 % for type III, 0 % for type IV, respectively (P = 0.002). The overall intraoperative complication rate was 11.8 %, and none of them led to severe neurological damage or death. The follow-up modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were significantly decreased in successfully revascularized patients, whilst there were no significant changes in the other failed patients.

CONCLUSION

For symptomatic CICAO, our newly modified angiographic classification may be comprehensive and useful in selecting suitable patients for recanalization and grading the difficulty of the procedures.

摘要

目的

将慢性颈内动脉闭塞(CICAO)的血管造影图像分为新的改良血管造影分类,并确定适合血管内再通的患者。

方法

本研究纳入了 51 例在我院接受血管内再通治疗的有症状 CICAO 患者。记录患者的临床资料、血管造影结果、手术结果和转归。我们试图根据形态闭塞模式和数字减影血管造影(DSA)上远端颈内动脉(ICA)管腔再通情况,将所有血管造影图像分为不同类别。

结果

根据血管造影特征,确定了 4 种类型(I-IV)的 CICAO。我们将 I 型定义为有锥形(IA)或钝形残端(IB)和远端 ICA 管腔再通伴侧支充盈;II 型为无残端但有远端 ICA 管腔再通;III 型为有锥形(IIIA)或钝形残端(IIIB)但无远端 ICA 管腔再通;IV 型为无残端且无远端 ICA 管腔再通。I 型、II 型、III 型和 IV 型的再通成功率分别为 90.3%、60.0%、50.0%和 0%(P=0.002)。总的术中并发症发生率为 11.8%,均未导致严重的神经损伤或死亡。成功再通患者的随访改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分显著降低,而其他失败患者无明显变化。

结论

对于有症状的 CICAO,我们新的改良血管造影分类可能是全面和有用的,可以选择适合再通的患者,并对手术难度进行分级。

相似文献

1
Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: proposal of a modified angiographic classification and clinical outcomes.症状性慢性颈内动脉闭塞的血管内再通:改良血管造影分类及临床结果的建议。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;233:107935. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107935. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronically occluded internal carotid artery: feasibility, safety, a modified radiographic classification system, and clinical outcomes.症状性亚急性和慢性闭塞颈内动脉的血管内再通:可行性、安全性、改良的影像学分类系统和临床结果。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Oct;62(10):1323-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02458-0. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
The additional value of high-resolution vessel wall imaging in screening suitable chronic internal carotid artery occlusion candidates for endovascular recanalization: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.高分辨率血管壁成像在筛选适合进行血管内再通治疗的慢性颈内动脉闭塞患者中的附加价值:与数字减影血管造影的比较
Acta Radiol. 2023 Apr;64(4):1702-1711. doi: 10.1177/02841851221127563. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
[Related factors of successful endovascular therapy in patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion].[慢性颈内动脉闭塞患者血管内治疗成功的相关因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 6;103(21):1649-1652. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221212-02629.
5
Endovascular Recanalization of Symptomatic Chronic ICA Occlusion: Procedural Outcomes and Radiologic Predictors.症状性颈内动脉慢性闭塞的血管内再通:操作结果和影像学预测因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):303-310. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7804. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Endovascular Recanalization of Symptomatic Nonacute Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Proposal of a New Angiographic Classification.症状性非急性颅内颈内动脉闭塞的血管内再通:一种新的血管造影分类的提出。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(2):299-305. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6928. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
7
A modified endovascular treatment protocol for iatrogenic internal carotid artery injuries following endoscopic endonasal surgery.内镜经鼻手术后医源性颈内动脉损伤的改良血管内治疗方案。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 25;132(2):343-350. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181048. Print 2020 Feb 1.
8
Management of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: should endovascular recanalization of the extracranial or intracranial occlusive lesion be done first?串联闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中的管理:颅外或颅内闭塞病变的血管内再通应先进行哪一个?
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Apr;42(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16500.
9
Endovascular revascularization of symptomatic chronic total occlusions of the internal carotid artery using a proximal balloon protection device.使用近端球囊保护装置对症状性颈内动脉慢性完全闭塞进行血管内血运重建。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jan-Mar;104(1):36850421998870. doi: 10.1177/0036850421998870.
10
A single-center retrospective study of the COCO technique in the treatment of chronic internal carotid artery occlusion.COCO 技术治疗慢性颈内动脉闭塞的单中心回顾性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jul 16;16(8):756-763. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020451.