• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AJCC 第 8 版预后分期与 UICC 解剖分期在原发性乳腺癌患者中的比较:单机构回顾性研究。

Comparison between AJCC 8th prognostic stage and UICC anatomical stage in patients with primary breast cancer: a single institutional retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.

National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2020 Nov;27(6):1114-1125. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01115-x. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-020-01115-x
PMID:32495291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7567685/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) proposed a prognostic stage (PS), which included not only anatomical factors, but also biological factors. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological significance of the PS and to compare PS and anatomical stage (AS) that has been established by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2017, 800 patients were included in the study. Patients were classified using pathological UICC AS and pathological AJCC PS. The usefulness of PS in comparison with AS was validated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

A total of 401 (50.1%) patients had pathological AS I, 324 (40.5%) had AS II, and 75 (9.4%) had AS III. Meanwhile, 535 (66.8%) had pathological PS I, 163 (20.4%) had PS II, and 102 (12.8%) had PS III. The number of AS II cases was 1.99-fold higher than that of PS II cases. For each stage, these survival curves were almost similar between AS and PS classification. Therefore, many patients to be classified into stage I and stage III were included in AS II group, while many patients to be classified into stage II were included in AS I group. To trichotomize the survival groups, PS appeared to be more specific than AS, and AIC and C-index confirmed the speculation.

CONCLUSION

For the prognostication of primary breast cancer patients, AJCC PS appeared to be able to stratify the cases more appropriately than UICC AS.

摘要

背景

第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)提出了一种预后分期(PS),它不仅包括解剖因素,还包括生物因素。我们旨在研究 PS 的临床病理意义,并比较 AJCC 提出的 PS 与国际抗癌联合会(UICC)建立的解剖分期(AS)。

方法

在 2002 年至 2017 年间,共有 800 名患者纳入本研究。患者采用病理 UICC AS 和病理 AJCC PS 进行分类。使用赤池信息量准则(AIC)和哈雷一致性指数(C-index)验证 PS 与 AS 的有效性。

结果

共有 401 例(50.1%)患者的病理 AS I 期,324 例(40.5%)患者的 AS II 期,75 例(9.4%)患者的 AS III 期。同时,535 例(66.8%)患者的病理 PS I 期,163 例(20.4%)患者的 PS II 期,102 例(12.8%)患者的 PS III 期。PS II 期的病例数是 PS II 期的 1.99 倍。对于每个分期,AS 和 PS 分类的生存曲线几乎相似。因此,许多原本应归入 I 期和 III 期的患者被归入 AS II 组,而许多原本应归入 II 期的患者则归入 AS I 组。为了将生存组分为三组,PS 似乎比 AS 更具特异性,AIC 和 C-index 也证实了这一推测。

结论

对于原发性乳腺癌患者的预后预测,AJCC PS 似乎比 UICC AS 更能适当地分层病例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/1e86911d93eb/12282_2020_1115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/c8663e3b024d/12282_2020_1115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/9fe49173ca67/12282_2020_1115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/5d550e62e22e/12282_2020_1115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/1e86911d93eb/12282_2020_1115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/c8663e3b024d/12282_2020_1115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/9fe49173ca67/12282_2020_1115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/5d550e62e22e/12282_2020_1115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f720/7567685/1e86911d93eb/12282_2020_1115_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison between AJCC 8th prognostic stage and UICC anatomical stage in patients with primary breast cancer: a single institutional retrospective study.AJCC 第 8 版预后分期与 UICC 解剖分期在原发性乳腺癌患者中的比较:单机构回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer. 2020 Nov;27(6):1114-1125. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01115-x. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
2
The comparison of the anatomic stage and pathological prognostic stage according to the AJCC 8th edition for the prognosis in Japanese breast cancer patients: data from a single institution.根据第 8 版 AJCC 对日本乳腺癌患者预后的解剖分期和病理预后分期比较:单机构数据。
Breast Cancer. 2020 Nov;27(6):1137-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01116-w. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Effectiveness of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for selecting patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer for post-mastectomy radiotherapy: a joint analysis of 1986 patients from two institutions.AJCC 第 8 版分期系统对 T1-2N1 乳腺癌患者选择术后放疗的有效性:来自两个机构的 1986 例患者的联合分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07267-5.
4
Improved Prognostication for the Updated AJCC Breast Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging Varied in Higher-Stage Groups.更新后的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)乳腺癌病理预后分期在更高分期组中,其预后预测得到了改善,但存在差异。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun;20(3):253-261.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.甲状腺微小乳头状癌的生存情况:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库对美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第7版和第8版分期系统的比较分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jan 24;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00010. eCollection 2019.
6
Prognostic value of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for Japanese patients treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy for breast cancer.AJCC 第 8 版分期系统对接受手术联合放疗的日本乳腺癌患者的预后价值。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug;25(8):1499-1505. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01686-x. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.提出并验证了一种改良的分期系统,以提高第 8 版 AJCC/UICC pTNM 分期系统对胃腺癌预后预测性能:一项多中心研究及外部验证。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 Nov 19;38(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0337-5.
8
The combined pN stage and breast cancer subtypes in breast cancer: a better discriminator of outcome can be used to refine the 8th AJCC staging manual.乳腺癌中的联合 pN 分期和乳腺癌亚型:可更好地区分预后的指标,可用于完善第 8 版 AJCC 分期手册。
Breast Cancer. 2018 May;25(3):315-324. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0833-0. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
9
The Prognostic Value of the AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版分期系统对接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;27(2):352-358. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07636-w. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
10
Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with 10-year follow-up.第八版 AJCC/UICC 鼻咽癌分期系统的验证:来自具有 10 年随访的非流行地区队列的结果。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Nov;98:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Information and Prognosis of High-risk Luminal Breast Cancer Subjects Eligible for the MonarhE Study.符合MonarhE研究条件的高危腔面型乳腺癌患者的临床信息与预后
JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):486-497. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0243. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Relationship between Volpara Density Grade and Compressed Breast Thickness in Japanese Patients with Breast Cancer.日本乳腺癌患者中Volpara密度分级与乳房压缩厚度之间的关系。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;14(15):1651. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151651.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the newly proposed American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer prognostic staging group and proposing a new staging system using the National Cancer Database.验证新提出的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)乳腺癌预后分期组,并利用国家癌症数据库提出新的分期系统。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):303-313. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4832-9. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting.基于人群的验证 8 版 AJCC 乳腺癌预后分期系统。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):269-275. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4577-x. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
The Evolving Landscape of HER2 Targeting in Breast Cancer.
HER2 靶向治疗在乳腺癌中的不断发展。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1154-61. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2286.
4
Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Systemic Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.使用生物标志物指导转移性乳腺癌女性全身治疗决策:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2695-704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1459. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.《2013 年全球癌症负担》。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):505-27. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735.
6
Breast Cancer Version 2.2015.乳腺癌临床实践指南(2015 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Apr;13(4):448-75. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0060.
7
Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.比较两个具有右删失生存结局的相关C指数:一种一次性非参数方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 20;34(4):685-703. doi: 10.1002/sim.6370. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
8
Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.人表皮生长因子受体 2 检测在乳腺癌中的应用:美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3997-4013. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling indices with 3 different cutoff values, histological grade, and nuclear grade in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers.在激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、无淋巴结转移的浸润性乳腺癌中,Ki-67标记指数采用3种不同临界值、组织学分级和核分级的预后影响。
Breast Cancer. 2015 Mar;22(2):141-52. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0464-4. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
10
Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer.曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗 HER2 阳性乳腺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1273-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910383.