Ekert Jason E, Deakyne Julianna, Pribul-Allen Philippa, Terry Rebecca, Schofield Christopher, Jeong Claire G, Storey Joanne, Mohamet Lisa, Francis Jo, Naidoo Anita, Amador Alejandro, Klein Jean-Louis, Rowan Wendy
In Vitro In Vivo Translation, Research, Pharmaceutical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
In Vitro In Vivo Translation, Research, Pharmaceutical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, UK.
SLAS Discov. 2020 Dec;25(10):1174-1190. doi: 10.1177/2472555220923332. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
The pharmaceutical industry is continuing to face high research and development (R&D) costs and low overall success rates of clinical compounds during drug development. There is an increasing demand for development and validation of healthy or disease-relevant and physiological human cellular models that can be implemented in early-stage discovery, thereby shifting attrition of future therapeutics to a point in discovery at which the costs are significantly lower. There needs to be a paradigm shift in the early drug discovery phase (which is lengthy and costly), away from simplistic cellular models that show an inability to effectively and efficiently reproduce healthy or human disease-relevant states to steer target and compound selection for safety, pharmacology, and efficacy questions. This perspective article covers the various stages of early drug discovery from target identification (ID) and validation to the hit/lead discovery phase, lead optimization, and preclinical safety. We outline key aspects that should be considered when developing, qualifying, and implementing complex in vitro models (CIVMs) during these phases, because criteria such as cell types (e.g., cell lines, primary cells, stem cells, and tissue), platform (e.g., spheroids, scaffolds or hydrogels, organoids, microphysiological systems, and bioprinting), throughput, automation, and single and multiplexing endpoints will vary. The article emphasizes the need to adequately qualify these CIVMs such that they are suitable for various applications (e.g., context of use) of drug discovery and translational research. The article ends looking to the future, in which there is an increase in combining computational modeling, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML), and CIVMs.
制药行业在药物研发过程中持续面临高昂的研发成本以及临床化合物总体成功率较低的问题。对于能够应用于早期发现阶段的健康或疾病相关的生理性人类细胞模型的开发和验证需求日益增长,从而将未来治疗药物的淘汰点转移至发现阶段中成本显著更低的环节。在早期药物发现阶段(该阶段漫长且成本高昂)需要进行范式转变,摒弃那些无法有效且高效地重现健康或人类疾病相关状态以指导安全性、药理学和疗效问题的靶点及化合物选择的简单细胞模型。这篇观点文章涵盖了早期药物发现的各个阶段,从靶点识别与验证到先导化合物发现阶段、先导化合物优化以及临床前安全性。我们概述了在这些阶段开发、鉴定和应用复杂体外模型(CIVMs)时应考虑的关键方面,因为诸如细胞类型(例如细胞系、原代细胞、干细胞和组织)、平台(例如球体、支架或水凝胶、类器官、微生理系统和生物打印)、通量、自动化以及单终点和多终点等标准会有所不同。文章强调需要充分鉴定这些CIVMs,使其适用于药物发现和转化研究的各种应用(例如使用背景)。文章最后展望了未来,届时计算建模、人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)与CIVMs的结合将会增加。