• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保险覆盖范围对处方避孕药使用的影响:平价医疗法案的证据。

The Impact of Insurance Coverage on Utilization of Prescription Contraceptives: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.

出版信息

J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(3):571-601.

PMID:29993229
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates that prescription contraceptives be covered by private health insurance plans with no cost sharing. Using medical and prescription claims from a large national insurer, I estimate individual claim rates and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of prescription contraceptives for 329,642 women aged 13 to 45 who were enrolled in private health insurance between January 2008 and December 2013. I find that OOP spending on contraceptives has decreased sharply since the implementation of the ACA mandate. Using a difference-in-difference model that leverages employer level variation in compliance with the mandate, I estimate the effect of the mandate on use of both short- and long-term methods of prescription birth control. I find that the mandate has increased insurance claims for short-term contraceptive methods (the pill, patch, ring, shot, diaphragms/cervical caps, and prescription emergency contraception) by 4.8 percent and increased initiation of long-term methods (intrauterine devices, implant, or sterilization) by 15.8 percent. Using data from a national survey of reproductive age women during this same time period, a back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that the mandate increased total use of any method of prescription contraceptive use by 2.95 percentage points among privately insured women in 2013, or a 6.57 percent relative increase. These increases in use of prescription contraceptives among privately insured women in the United States as a result of the ACA mandate have important potential implications for fertility rates, health care spending, and economic outcomes for women and their families.

摘要

平价医疗法案(ACA)要求私人医疗保险计划免费提供处方避孕药具。我利用一家大型全国保险公司的医疗和处方索赔数据,估算了 2008 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间 329642 名年龄在 13 至 45 岁之间参加私人医疗保险的女性的个人索赔率和处方避孕药具的自付费用(OOP)。我发现,自 ACA 授权实施以来,避孕药具的 OOP 支出大幅下降。我利用雇主遵守授权规定的差异来利用差异中的差异模型,估算了该授权对短期和长期处方生育控制方法使用的影响。我发现,该授权增加了短期避孕药具方法(避孕药、贴片、环、注射、隔膜/宫颈帽和处方紧急避孕药)的保险索赔 4.8%,并增加了长期方法(宫内节育器、植入物或绝育)的启动率 15.8%。利用同期全国育龄妇女调查数据进行的简单计算表明,2013 年,该授权使私人保险女性中任何处方避孕药具的总使用率增加了 2.95 个百分点,即相对增加了 6.57%。由于 ACA 授权,美国私人保险女性中处方避孕药具使用量的增加对生育率、医疗保健支出以及妇女及其家庭的经济结果具有重要的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Insurance Coverage on Utilization of Prescription Contraceptives: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.保险覆盖范围对处方避孕药使用的影响:平价医疗法案的证据。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(3):571-601.
2
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Contraceptive Use and Costs among Privately Insured Women.平价医疗法案对私人保险女性避孕措施使用和费用的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
3
Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Uptake before and after the Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Mandate in Women Undergoing First Trimester Surgical Abortion.《平价医疗法案避孕令实施前后行早期妊娠手术流产妇女长效可逆避孕措施使用情况》
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jul-Aug;28(4):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 28.
4
Women Saw Large Decrease In Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Contraceptives After ACA Mandate Removed Cost Sharing.ACA 禁令取消了避孕措施的费用分担后,女性的避孕措施自付费用大幅下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1204-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0127.
5
Affordable Care Act's Mandate Eliminating Contraceptive Cost Sharing Influenced Choices Of Women With Employer Coverage.《平价医疗法案》中取消避孕费用分担的强制规定影响了有雇主医保的女性的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1608-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1457.
6
Prescription Contraceptive Sales Following the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后的处方药销售情况
Matern Child Health J. 2019 May;23(5):657-666. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2680-1.
7
Changes in out-of-pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement.在联邦避孕覆盖要求实施期间,私人保险女性避孕自付费用的变化。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.《平价医疗法案》对长效可逆避孕方法使用的早期影响
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):811-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000551.
9
Are women benefiting from the Affordable Care Act? A real-world evaluation of the impact of the Affordable Care Act on out-of-pocket costs for contraceptives.女性是否从《平价医疗法案》中受益?对《平价医疗法案》对避孕药具自付费用影响的实际评估。
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Trends in Birth Rates After Elimination of Cost Sharing for Contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案取消避孕费用分担后出生率的变化趋势》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Contraception, Pregnancy, and Pregnancy Termination Rates.《平价医疗法案》对避孕、怀孕及堕胎率的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):196-203. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005796. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
Dispersion of contraceptive access policies across the United States from 2006 to 2021.2006年至2021年美国各地避孕服务获取政策的差异
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 13;27:101827. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101827. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
The Missing Baby Bust: The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy, and Childbirth Among Low-Income Women.
失踪的婴儿潮:新冠疫情对低收入女性避孕、怀孕及分娩的影响
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(4):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09703-9. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Margerison et al. Respond to "Medicaid Policy and Reproductive Autonomy".马杰里森等人回应《医疗补助政策与生殖自主权》。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1502-1503. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa291.
5
Trends in Birth Rates After Elimination of Cost Sharing for Contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案取消避孕费用分担后出生率的变化趋势》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398.
6
Evaluation of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Contraceptive Care in US Community Health Centers.平价医疗法案下的医疗补助扩张评估和美国社区卫生中心的避孕服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6874.
7
Utilization of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in the United States After vs Before the 2016 US Presidential Election.2016 年美国总统大选后与前相比,美国长效可逆避孕措施的使用情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):444-446. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7111.