EpiSolutions LLC, Melbourne, FL, USA.
Shell International B.V. The Hague, the Netherlands.
Toxicol Lett. 2020 Nov 1;334:117-144. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
This paper derives an occupational exposure limit for benzene using quality assessed data. Seventy-seven genotoxicity and 36 haematotoxicity studies in workers were scored for study quality with an adapted tool based on that of Vlaanderen et al., 2008 (Environ Health. Perspect. 116 1700-5). These endpoints were selected as they are the most sensitive and relevant to the proposed mode of action (MOA) and protecting against these will protect against benzene carcinogenicity. Lowest and No- Adverse Effect Concentrations (LOAECs and NOAECs) were derived from the highest quality studies (i.e. those ranked in the top tertile or top half) and further assessed as being "more certain" or "less certain". Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess whether alternative "high quality" constructs affected conclusions. The lowest haematotoxicity LOAECs showed effects near 2 ppm (8 h TWA), and no effects at 0.59 ppm. For genotoxicity, studies also showed effects near 2 ppm and showed no effects at about 0.69 ppm. Several sensitivity analyses supported these observations. These data define a benzene LOAEC of 2 ppm (8 h TWA) and a NOAEC of 0.5 ppm (8 h TWA). Allowing for possible subclinical effects in bone marrow not apparent in studies of peripheral blood endpoints, an OEL of 0.25 ppm (8 h TWA) is proposed.
本文使用经过质量评估的数据推导出了苯的职业接触限值。对 77 项遗传毒性和 36 项血液毒性的工人研究进行了研究质量评分,评分工具是基于 Vlaanderen 等人(Environ Health. Perspect. 116 1700-5)的工具改编的。选择这些终点是因为它们是与拟议作用模式(MOA)最相关和最敏感的,针对这些终点的保护将防止苯的致癌性。最低和无不良效应浓度(LOAEC 和 NOAEC)是从最高质量的研究中得出的(即排名在前三分之一或前一半的研究),并进一步评估为“更确定”或“不太确定”。进行了几项敏感性分析,以评估替代“高质量”结构是否会影响结论。最低血液毒性 LOAEC 显示出接近 2ppm(8 小时 TWA)的效应,而在 0.59ppm 时没有效应。对于遗传毒性,研究也显示出接近 2ppm 的效应,在约 0.69ppm 时没有效应。几项敏感性分析支持了这些观察结果。这些数据定义了苯的 LOAEC 为 2ppm(8 小时 TWA)和 NOAEC 为 0.5ppm(8 小时 TWA)。考虑到骨髓中的亚临床效应可能在末梢血终点研究中不明显,建议 OEL 为 0.25ppm(8 小时 TWA)。