Williams Lisa A, Brosnan Sarah F, Clay Zanna
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
Department of Psychology, Language Research Center, Department of Philosophy, and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, PO Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010 United States.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Aug;115:299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Anthropomorphism is the attribution of human-like capacities and traits to non-human entities. Anthropomorphism is ubiquitous in everyday life and in scientific domains, operating both implicitly and explicitly as a function of the human lens through which we view the world. A rich history of work in psychology, animal behavior, cognitive science, and philosophy has highlighted the negative and, to a lesser degree, the positive implications of anthropomorphism. In this article, we aim to provide a nuanced perspective of how anthropomorphism impacts the work of comparative affective science. Specifically, we discuss three domains of empirical inquiry in which lessons can be drawn about the benefits and pitfalls of anthropomorphism: responses to death, inequity aversion, and prosocial behavior. On balance, we advocate a mindful approach to anthropomorphizing in comparative affective science, and comparative science more generally.
拟人化是指将类人的能力和特征赋予非人类实体。拟人化在日常生活和科学领域中无处不在,它作为我们观察世界的人类视角的一种功能,以隐性和显性的方式发挥作用。心理学、动物行为学、认知科学和哲学领域丰富的研究历史凸显了拟人化的负面影响,以及在较小程度上的积极影响。在本文中,我们旨在提供一个细致入微的视角,探讨拟人化如何影响比较情感科学的工作。具体而言,我们讨论了三个实证研究领域,从中可以汲取关于拟人化的益处和陷阱的经验教训:对死亡的反应、不公平厌恶和亲社会行为。总体而言,我们提倡在比较情感科学以及更广泛的比较科学中,以谨慎的态度进行拟人化。