From the Departments of Radiology (F.C., S.B., A.A.).
Department of Radiology (B.E.C.), Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):1054-1060. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6570. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
Carotid near-occlusion has been subclassified into near-occlusion with and without collapse. We aimed to compare the technical success and perioperative complication rates of carotid artery stent placement with special attention to these subtypes to see whether there is a clinical relevance of this subclassification.
From January 2014 to January 2018, we retrospectively evaluated all patients with atherosclerotic extracranial carotid stenosis treated by carotid artery stent placement. Patients with near-occlusion were identified based on DSA findings. Patient characteristics, the presence of criteria for near-occlusion and collapse, arterial diameters, technical success rate, and perioperative (≤30 days) complications were analyzed.
We identified 59 near-occlusions in 58 (46 men, 11 with collapse) patients. Forty-one patients (70.7%) were symptomatic. Technical success rate was 98.3% (58 of 59 procedures). In 1 case of near-occlusion with collapse, we were not able to pass through the stenosis. Compared with patients without collapse (4.2% of 48 cases), those with collapse (30% of 10 stented patients) had significantly higher rates of postintervention hyperperfusion syndrome ( = .032). In the whole cohort, the permanent morbidity and mortality rate was 3.4% (1.7% permanent morbidity and 1.7% mortality). For asymptomatic and symptomatic near-occlusion groups, the rates were 0% and 4.9%, respectively. The composite risk of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction was similar between the groups with and without collapse ( = .682). Rate of hyperperfusion syndrome (with or without permanent deficit) was similar ( = 1) in preoperatively symptomatic patients versus asymptomatic patients (9.8% vs 5.9%). Internal carotid artery diameter consistently increased after carotid artery stent placement in patients with collapse and was not related to the development of hyperperfusion syndrome.
Care should be taken to minimize hyperperfusion risk in patients with near-occlusion undergoing CAS, especially in the subgroup of patients with collapse and in patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
颈内动脉近闭塞已分为伴和不伴塌陷的近闭塞。我们旨在比较颈动脉支架置入术的技术成功率和围手术期并发症发生率,并特别关注这些亚型,以观察这种亚分类是否具有临床相关性。
从 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月,我们回顾性评估了所有接受颈动脉支架置入术治疗的动脉粥样硬化性颅外颈动脉狭窄患者。根据 DSA 结果确定近闭塞患者。分析患者特征、近闭塞和塌陷的存在标准、动脉直径、技术成功率和围手术期(≤30 天)并发症。
我们在 58 例患者(46 例男性,11 例有塌陷)中发现了 59 个近闭塞。41 例患者(70.7%)有症状。技术成功率为 98.3%(58 例/59 例)。在 1 例伴塌陷的近闭塞患者中,我们无法通过狭窄部位。与无塌陷的患者(48 例中的 4.2%)相比,有塌陷的患者(10 例支架置入患者中的 30%)术后高灌注综合征的发生率明显更高( =.032)。在整个队列中,永久性发病率和死亡率为 3.4%(1.7%永久性发病率和 1.7%死亡率)。对于无症状和有症状的近闭塞组,发病率分别为 0%和 4.9%。伴或不伴塌陷的两组之间的卒中、死亡和心肌梗死的复合风险相似( =.682)。高灌注综合征(伴或不伴永久性缺陷)的发生率在术前有症状的患者和无症状的患者之间相似(9.8% vs 5.9%)。在有塌陷的患者中,颈动脉支架置入后颈内动脉直径持续增加,且与高灌注综合征的发生无关。
在接受 CAS 的近闭塞患者中,应注意尽量降低高灌注风险,尤其是在塌陷亚组患者以及症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中。