• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术治疗伴有复发症状的颈动脉近闭塞病变

Carotid Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Carotid Near-Occlusion With Recurrent Symptoms.

作者信息

Zhang Jianbin, Chen Jie, Xu Xiaojie, Sun Mingsheng, Chen Shu, Liu Peng, Ye Zhidong

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 14;13:765795. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.765795. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.765795
PMID:35493837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9046581/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Report our preliminary experience of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid near-occlusion (CNO) with recurrent symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively analyze the demographics, treatment detail, and outcomes data of 122 patients with CNO from 2014 to 2020. According to whether distal full collapse exists, patients were classified into the full collapse group and the non-full collapse group. The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other variables were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients with CNO and recurrent symptoms were enrolled. The demographics were comparable between the two groups. Thirty-day incidence of primary endpoints was 1.85% in the full collapse group and 4.41% in the non-full collapse group. Twelve-month incidence of primary endpoints was 7.41% in the full collapse group and 4.41% in the non-full collapse group. One re-stenosis occurred in the non-full collapse group 8 months after CEA.

CONCLUSION

For patients with CNO with recurrent symptoms, CEA is not worse than the results described in historical control groups, despite whether distal full collapse exists. The shunt is important to avoid intraoperative hypoperfusion and postoperative hyperperfusion. The long-term results should be further evaluated.

摘要

目的

报告我们采用颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)治疗有复发症状的颈动脉近闭塞(CNO)的初步经验。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2014年至2020年122例CNO患者的人口统计学资料、治疗细节和结局数据。根据是否存在远端完全塌陷,将患者分为完全塌陷组和非完全塌陷组。比较两组的死亡、心肌梗死、中风发生率及其他变量。

结果

共纳入122例有复发症状的CNO患者。两组的人口统计学资料具有可比性。完全塌陷组的30天主要终点发生率为1.85%,非完全塌陷组为4.41%。完全塌陷组的12个月主要终点发生率为7.41%,非完全塌陷组为4.41%。非完全塌陷组在CEA术后8个月发生1例再狭窄。

结论

对于有复发症状的CNO患者,无论是否存在远端完全塌陷,CEA的结果均不劣于历史对照组所描述的结果。分流对于避免术中低灌注和术后高灌注很重要。长期结果应进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3606/9046581/4f5c73480778/fneur-13-765795-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3606/9046581/4f5c73480778/fneur-13-765795-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3606/9046581/4f5c73480778/fneur-13-765795-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Carotid Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Carotid Near-Occlusion With Recurrent Symptoms.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗伴有复发症状的颈动脉近闭塞病变
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 14;13:765795. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.765795. eCollection 2022.
2
Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion with full collapse might cause a very high risk of stroke.症状性颈动脉近闭塞伴完全闭塞可能导致极高的中风风险。
J Intern Med. 2015 May;277(5):615-23. doi: 10.1111/joim.12318. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
3
A Systematic Review and Updated Metaanalysis for Carotid Near-Occlusion.颈动脉近闭塞的系统评价与更新的荟萃分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:636-645.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.093. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Cartoid Near Occlusion: Time to Re-think Endarectomy?颈动脉近乎闭塞:是时候重新思考内膜切除术了?
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 15;28(2):118-23. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3779.
5
Relevance of Distal Arterial Collapse in Stenting of Atherosclerotic Near-Occlusion of the Carotid Artery.远端动脉塌陷与颈动脉粥样硬化接近闭塞支架置入的相关性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):1054-1060. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6570. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
The impact of intraoperative shunting on early neurologic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术术中分流对早期神经功能结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.105. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
7
Defining carotid near-occlusion with full collapse: a pooled analysis.用完全塌陷定义颈动脉近闭塞:汇总分析。
Neuroradiology. 2022 Jan;64(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02728-5. Epub 2021 May 4.
8
Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion causes a high risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.症状性颈动脉近闭塞可导致同侧复发性缺血性卒中的风险增高。
J Neurol. 2020 Feb;267(2):522-530. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09605-5. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
9
Ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion: results from a multicenter registry study.有症状的颈动脉近乎闭塞患者的超声和血流动力学特征:一项多中心注册研究的结果
Neuroradiology. 2021 May;63(5):705-711. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02567-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Managing recurrent carotid artery disease with redo carotid endarterectomy: a 10-year retrospective case series.采用再次颈动脉内膜切除术治疗复发性颈动脉疾病:一项10年回顾性病例系列研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):908-16. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid near-occlusion diagnostics and its consequences: A systematic review.颈动脉近闭塞诊断及其后果:一项系统评价。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jul 15:23969873251355158. doi: 10.1177/23969873251355158.
2
The pitfalls and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carotid near-occlusion: a narrative review.颈动脉近乎闭塞患者诊断与治疗中的陷阱和挑战:一篇叙述性综述
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):9600-9619. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1037. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Cartoid Near Occlusion: Time to Re-think Endarectomy?

本文引用的文献

1
Management of internal carotid artery near-occlusion: the need for updated evidence.颈内动脉近闭塞的管理:更新证据的必要性。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1263. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.148.
2
Relevance of Distal Arterial Collapse in Stenting of Atherosclerotic Near-Occlusion of the Carotid Artery.远端动脉塌陷与颈动脉粥样硬化接近闭塞支架置入的相关性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):1054-1060. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6570. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Update on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.脑高灌注综合征更新。
颈动脉近乎闭塞:是时候重新思考内膜切除术了?
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 15;28(2):118-23. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3779.
4
Dilation of proximal internal carotid artery collapse due to severe distal stenosis after angioplasty for distal stenosis: A case report.血管成形术治疗远端狭窄后因严重远端狭窄导致近端颈内动脉扩张塌陷:一例报告。
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 24;14:75. doi: 10.25259/SNI_27_2023. eCollection 2023.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):788-793. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015621. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
A Systematic Review and Updated Metaanalysis for Carotid Near-Occlusion.颈动脉近闭塞的系统评价与更新的荟萃分析
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;66:636-645.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.093. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion causes a high risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.症状性颈动脉近闭塞可导致同侧复发性缺血性卒中的风险增高。
J Neurol. 2020 Feb;267(2):522-530. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09605-5. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Comparison of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting for Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Near-Occlusion.症状性颈内动脉近段闭塞患者颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):1207-1212. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6085. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Meta-analysis of the outcomes of treatment of internal carotid artery near occlusion.Meta 分析治疗颈内动脉近段闭塞的结果。
Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):665-671. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11159.
8
Medical Therapy for Asymptomatic Patients and Stent Placement for Symptomatic Patients Presenting with Carotid Artery Near-Occlusion with Full Collapse.无症状患者的药物治疗及有症状的颈动脉近乎完全闭塞患者的支架置入术
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jul;29(7):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.779. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Revascularization and Acute Ischemic Stroke.颈动脉血运重建术后和急性缺血性脑卒中后的大脑过度灌注综合征。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Mar 19;22(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0678-4.
10
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.