Castellini Greta, Corbetta Davide, Cecchetto Simone, Gianola Silvia
Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
Department of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e037133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037133.
To explore the knowledge, use, attitudes towards Evidence-based Medicine, also known as Evidence-based Practice (EBP), and perceived barriers to its dissemination among physiotherapists.
Cross-sectional study.
Members of the Italian Association of Physiotherapists (n=2000) were invited to participate in an online survey about EBP knowledge and use.
The survey questionnaire comprised four sections: (1) respondent characteristics; (2) knowledge of EBP principles; (3) attitude, use and perceived effectiveness of EBP; (4) perceived barriers to implementing EBP in clinical practice.
Out of 2000 physiotherapists, 1289 participated in the survey (64.5% response rate). Overall, 90% perceived EBP as useful and necessary for their clinical practice. More than 85% stated that they were familiar with the principles of EBP, 75% reported that they were able to search online databases for relevant information and 60% reported that they were able to understand statistical analyses. However, 56% believed that patient preferences and 39% that clinical expertise are not part of the EBP model. Half stated that they understood and could explain the term 'meta-analysis' but only 17% knew what a forest plot is and just 20% correctly judged the finding of a given meta-analysis. Lack of time was reported as the main barrier to EBP.
The majority of Italian physiotherapists overrated their knowledge about EBP, demonstrating a gap between perceived and actual knowledge of EBP in this population.
探讨物理治疗师对循证医学(也称为循证实践,EBP)的知识、应用、态度以及其传播过程中所感知到的障碍。
横断面研究。
邀请意大利物理治疗师协会成员(n = 2000)参与一项关于循证医学知识与应用的在线调查。
调查问卷包括四个部分:(1)受访者特征;(2)循证医学原则知识;(3)循证医学的态度、应用及感知有效性;(4)临床实践中实施循证医学的感知障碍。
2000名物理治疗师中,1289人参与了调查(回复率64.5%)。总体而言,90%的人认为循证医学对其临床实践有用且必要。超过85%的人表示熟悉循证医学原则,75%的人报告称能够在在线数据库中搜索相关信息,60%的人报告称能够理解统计分析。然而,56%的人认为患者偏好,39%的人认为临床专业知识不属于循证医学模式。半数人表示理解并能解释“荟萃分析”一词,但只有17%的人知道森林图是什么,只有20%的人能正确判断给定荟萃分析的结果。报告称时间不足是循证医学的主要障碍。
大多数意大利物理治疗师高估了他们对循证医学的知识,表明该人群在循证医学的感知知识与实际知识之间存在差距。