• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善外科患者的重病护理:外科姑息治疗质量指标。

Improving Serious Illness Care for Surgical Patients: Quality Indicators for Surgical Palliative Care.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):196-202. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003894.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003894
PMID:32502076
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Develop quality indicators that measure access to and the quality of primary PC delivered to seriously ill surgical patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PC for seriously ill surgical patients, including aligning treatments with patients' goals and managing symptoms, is associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes and decreased healthcare utilization. However, efforts to integrate PC alongside restorative surgical care are limited by a lack of surgical quality indicators to evaluate primary PC delivery.

METHODS

We developed a set of 27 preliminary indicators that measured palliative processes of care across the surgical episode, including goals of care, decision-making, symptom assessment, and issues related to palliative surgery. Then using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness method, a 12-member expert advisory panel rated the validity (primary outcome) and feasibility of each indicator twice: (1) remotely and (2) after an in-person moderated discussion.

RESULTS

After 2 rounds of rating, 24 indicators were rated as valid, covering the preoperative evaluation (9 indicators), immediate preoperative readiness (2 indicators), intraoperative (1 indicator), postoperative (8 indicators), and end of life (4 indicators) phases of surgical care.

CONCLUSIONS

This set of quality indicators provides a comprehensive set of process measures that possess the potential to measure high quality PC for seriously ill surgical patients throughout the surgical episode.

摘要

目的

制定衡量严重疾病手术患者初级 PC 获得情况和质量的质量指标。

背景资料概要

为严重疾病手术患者提供 PC,包括使治疗与患者的目标一致并管理症状,与改善以患者为导向的结果和减少医疗保健利用有关。然而,由于缺乏评估初级 PC 提供情况的手术质量指标,将 PC 与恢复性手术护理相结合的努力受到限制。

方法

我们制定了一套 27 个初步指标,用于衡量手术期间的姑息护理过程,包括护理目标、决策、症状评估以及与姑息手术相关的问题。然后,使用 RAND-UCLA 适宜性方法,一个由 12 名成员组成的专家咨询小组对每个指标的有效性(主要结果)和可行性进行了两次评估:(1)远程评估和(2)在现场讨论后评估。

结果

经过两轮评分,24 个指标被评为有效,涵盖了术前评估(9 个指标)、术前即刻准备(2 个指标)、术中(1 个指标)、术后(8 个指标)和生命末期(4 个指标)手术护理阶段。

结论

这套质量指标提供了一套全面的流程措施,有可能在整个手术过程中衡量严重疾病手术患者的高质量 PC。

相似文献

1
Improving Serious Illness Care for Surgical Patients: Quality Indicators for Surgical Palliative Care.改善外科患者的重病护理:外科姑息治疗质量指标。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):196-202. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003894.
2
Defining Serious Illness Among Adult Surgical Patients.定义成年外科患者的严重疾病。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):844-850.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Hospital Standards to Promote Optimal Surgical Care of the Older Adult: A Report From the Coalition for Quality in Geriatric Surgery.促进老年患者手术护理质量的医院标准:老年外科手术质量联盟报告
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):280-290. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002185.
4
Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease Due to Cirrhosis.肝硬化所致终末期肝病患者的姑息治疗质量指标
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4339-3. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Quality Indicators in Surgical Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.手术舒缓治疗中的质量指标:系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):545-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.122. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: a modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project).姑息治疗组织质量指标的验证:一项在七个欧洲国家开展的改良兰德德尔菲研究(欧洲姑息治疗项目)
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):121-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493952. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Systematic Quality Monitoring For Specialized Palliative Care Services: Development of a Minimal Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Study (QPAC).专科姑息治疗服务的系统质量监测:姑息治疗研究(QPAC)最小质量指标集的制定
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):532-546. doi: 10.1177/1049909116642174. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
Developing indicators of appropriate and inappropriate end-of-life care in people with Alzheimer's disease, cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for population-level administrative databases: A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.为人群层面的行政数据库开发适用于阿尔茨海默病、癌症或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的适当和不适当临终关怀指标:一项 RAND/UCLA 适宜性研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):932-945. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705099. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup.危重症患者姑息治疗的拟议质量指标:罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会危重症工作组的共识
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11 Suppl):S404-11. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000242910.00801.53.
10
Potential quality indicators for seriously ill home care clients: a cross-sectional analysis using Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) data for Ontario.重病家庭护理客户的潜在质量指标:使用安大略省家庭护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)数据进行的横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 9;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0389-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review.终末期手术患者的姑息性预后工具:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1648-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Palliative care in acute care surgery: research challenges and opportunities.急性护理手术中的姑息治疗:研究挑战与机遇
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Mar 18;10(1):e001615. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001615. eCollection 2025.
3
From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion.
从指南到缺血性脑卒中患者护理的临床实践:系统评价和专家意见。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Dec;31(12):e16417. doi: 10.1111/ene.16417. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Palliative surgery: state of the science and future directions.姑息手术:科学现状与未来方向。
Br J Surg. 2024 Mar 2;111(3). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae068.
5
Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Team and Quality of Goals of Care Discussions in Palliative Surgical Oncology Patients.多学科团队的实施与姑息性外科肿瘤患者的目标关怀质量讨论。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8054-8060. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14190-z. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Prevalence of unpaid caregiving, pain, and depression in older seriously ill patients undergoing elective surgery.择期手术的老年重病患者中无偿护理、疼痛和抑郁的流行情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2151-2162. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18316. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
What If We Do Not Operate? Outcomes of Nonoperatively Managed Emergency General Surgery Patients.如果我们不进行手术会怎样?非手术治疗的急诊普通外科患者的结局。
J Surg Res. 2023 Apr;284:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.058. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
8
Surgeon-reported Factors Influencing Adoption of Quality Standards for Goal-concordant Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.外科医生报告的影响晚期癌症患者目标一致护理质量标准采用的因素:定性研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1000-e1005. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005441. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
Public Opinions About Surgery in Older Adults: A Thematic Analysis.老年人手术相关公众意见的主题分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e513-e519. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005286. Epub 2021 Nov 9.