• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重病家庭护理客户的潜在质量指标:使用安大略省家庭护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)数据进行的横断面分析。

Potential quality indicators for seriously ill home care clients: a cross-sectional analysis using Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) data for Ontario.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada.

Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 9;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0389-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-018-0389-y
PMID:30626374
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6325754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no formalized measures for the quality of home based palliative care in Ontario. This study developed a set of potential quality indicators for seriously ill home care clients using a standardized assessment.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care data for Ontario completed between 2006 and 2013 was used to develop quality indicators (QIs) thought to be relevant to the needs of older (65+) seriously ill clients. QIs were developed through a review of the literature and consultation with subject matter experts in palliative care. Serious illness was defined as a prognosis of less than 6 months to live or the presence of severe health instability. The rates of the QIs were stratified across Ontario's geographic regions, and across four common life-limiting illnesses to observe variation.

RESULTS

Within the sample, 14,312 clients were considered to be seriously ill and were more likely to experience negative health outcomes such as cognitive performance (OR = 2.77; 95% CI: 2.66-2.89) and pain (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.53-1.64). Twenty subject matter experts were consulted and a list of seven QIs was developed. Indicators with the highest overall rates were prevalence of falls (50%) prevalence of daily pain (47%), and prevalence of caregiver distress (42%). The range in QI rates was largest across regions for prevalence of caregiver distress (21.5%), the prevalence of falls (16.6%), and the prevalence of social isolation (13.7%). Those with some form of dementia were most likely to have a caregiver that was distressed (52.6%) or to experience a fall (53.3%).

CONCLUSION

Home care clients in Ontario who are seriously ill are experiencing high rates of negative health outcomes, many of which are amenable to change. The RAI-HC can be a useful tool in identifying these clients in order to better understand their needs and abilities. These results contribute significantly to the process of creating and validating a standardized set of QIs that can be generated by organizations using the RAI-HC as part of normal clinical practice.

摘要

背景

目前,安大略省还没有针对家庭姑息治疗质量的规范化措施。本研究使用标准化评估方法为重病家庭护理患者开发了一套潜在的质量指标。

方法

对 2006 年至 2013 年间完成的安大略省居民家庭护理评估工具(Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care)的数据进行二次分析,以确定与 65 岁以上重病患者需求相关的质量指标(QIs)。通过文献回顾和姑息治疗领域的专家咨询制定 QIs。严重疾病的定义是预计生存时间不到 6 个月或存在严重健康不稳定。根据安大略省的地理区域和四种常见的绝症对 QIs 的发生率进行分层,以观察变化。

结果

在样本中,14312 名患者被认为患有重病,更有可能经历负面健康结果,如认知表现(OR=2.77;95%CI:2.66-2.89)和疼痛(OR=1.59;95%CI:1.53-1.64)。咨询了 20 位专家,制定了 7 项 QIs。发生率最高的指标是跌倒发生率(50%)、每日疼痛发生率(47%)和照料者困扰发生率(42%)。在区域间,照料者困扰发生率(21.5%)、跌倒发生率(16.6%)和社会隔离发生率(13.7%)的 QI 率差异最大。有某种形式痴呆的患者最有可能出现困扰的照料者(52.6%)或跌倒(53.3%)。

结论

安大略省患有重病的家庭护理患者正经历着高比例的负面健康结果,其中许多结果是可以改变的。RAI-HC 可以作为一种有用的工具,用于识别这些患者,以便更好地了解他们的需求和能力。这些结果为创建和验证一套标准化的 QIs 做出了重要贡献,这些 QIs 可以由使用 RAI-HC 作为常规临床实践一部分的组织生成。

相似文献

1
Potential quality indicators for seriously ill home care clients: a cross-sectional analysis using Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) data for Ontario.重病家庭护理客户的潜在质量指标:使用安大略省家庭护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)数据进行的横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 9;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0389-y.
2
Quality Indicator Rates for Seriously Ill Home Care Clients: Analysis of Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care Data in Six Canadian Provinces.重病居家护理客户的质量指标率:对加拿大六个省份居家护理数据居民评估工具的分析。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1346-1356. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0022. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Predictors of caregiver distress among palliative home care clients in Ontario: evidence based on the interRAI Palliative Care.安大略省姑息治疗居家照护患者照顾者痛苦的预测因素:基于 interRAI 姑息治疗的证据。
Palliat Support Care. 2012 Sep;10(3):155-63. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000824. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review.基于居民评估工具-家庭护理版(RAI-HC)的家庭护理质量指标:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.
5
Comparing quality indicator rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.比较新冠疫情前后居家护理临终关怀客户的质量指标率。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 5;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01336-9.
6
A comparison of home care quality indicator rates in two Canadian provinces.加拿大两个省份家庭护理质量指标率的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 25;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-37.
7
Older Adults With a Combination of Vision and Hearing Impairment Experience Higher Rates of Cognitive Impairment, Functional Dependence, and Worse Outcomes Across a Set of Quality Indicators.同时存在视力和听力障碍的老年人在一系列的质量指标上,经历更高的认知障碍、功能依赖和更差的结局的风险。
J Aging Health. 2019 Jan;31(1):85-108. doi: 10.1177/0898264317723407. Epub 2017 Aug 13.
8
Selecting home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) for Switzerland: A public health and healthcare providers' perspective.从公共卫生和医疗服务提供者的角度出发,基于瑞士居家护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)选择居家护理质量指标
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244577. eCollection 2020.
9
Changes in social engagement and depression predict incident loneliness among seriously ill home care clients.社会参与度和抑郁状况的变化可预测重病居家照护患者新发孤独感。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Apr;16(2):170-179. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000128. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
The wish to die among palliative home care clients in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study.加拿大安大略省姑息家庭护理患者的死亡意愿:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Feb 29;15:24. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0093-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Mood Disturbances Across the Continuum of Care Based on Self-Report and Clinician Rated Measures in the interRAI Suite of Assessment Instruments.基于 interRAI 评估工具套件中自我报告和临床医生评定指标的连续护理过程中的情绪障碍
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 2;13:787463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.787463. eCollection 2022.
2
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.采用 interRAI 数据制定基于社区的姑息治疗质量指标的多阶段流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
3
Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review.基于居民评估工具-家庭护理版(RAI-HC)的家庭护理质量指标:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing indicators of appropriate and inappropriate end-of-life care in people with Alzheimer's disease, cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for population-level administrative databases: A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.为人群层面的行政数据库开发适用于阿尔茨海默病、癌症或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的适当和不适当临终关怀指标:一项 RAND/UCLA 适宜性研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):932-945. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705099. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
2
Expanding the Palliative Care Domains to Meet the Needs of a Community-Based Supportive Care Model.拓展姑息治疗领域以满足基于社区的支持性护理模式的需求。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Feb;35(2):258-265. doi: 10.1177/1049909117705061. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Identifying patients with advanced chronic conditions for a progressive palliative care approach: a cross-sectional study of prognostic indicators related to end-of-life trajectories.识别晚期慢性病患者以采用渐进性姑息治疗方法:一项关于与临终轨迹相关的预后指标的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 19;6(9):e012340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012340.
4
Systematic Quality Monitoring For Specialized Palliative Care Services: Development of a Minimal Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Study (QPAC).专科姑息治疗服务的系统质量监测:姑息治疗研究(QPAC)最小质量指标集的制定
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):532-546. doi: 10.1177/1049909116642174. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Quality of end-of-life cancer care in Canada: a retrospective four-province study using administrative health care data.加拿大临终癌症护理质量:一项利用行政医疗保健数据的四省回顾性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):341-55. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2636.
6
Measuring what matters: top-ranked quality indicators for hospice and palliative care from the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association.衡量重要指标:美国临终关怀与姑息治疗学会及临终关怀与姑息治疗护士协会评选出的临终关怀与姑息治疗顶级质量指标。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Apr;49(4):773-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Promoting palliative care in the community: production of the primary palliative care toolkit by the European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce in primary palliative care.在社区推广姑息治疗:欧洲姑息治疗协会初级姑息治疗特别工作组编制初级姑息治疗工具包
Palliat Med. 2015 Feb;29(2):101-11. doi: 10.1177/0269216314545006. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
8
Patient characteristics associated with prognostic awareness: a study of a Canadian palliative care population using the InterRAI palliative care instrument.与预后认知相关的患者特征:一项使用InterRAI姑息治疗工具对加拿大姑息治疗人群的研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Apr;49(4):716-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
9
Reliability of the interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF) and interRAI Home Care (HC).interRAI长期护理机构(LTCF)和interRAI家庭护理(HC)的可靠性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Feb;15(2):220-8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12330. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Use of the interRAI CHESS scale to predict mortality among persons with neurological conditions in three care settings.使用interRAI CHESS量表预测三种护理环境下神经系统疾病患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099066. eCollection 2014.