Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020 Jul 1;319(1):H162-H170. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00250.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Vasodilatory effects of insulin support the delivery of insulin and glucose to skeletal muscle. Concurrently, insulin exerts central effects that increase sympathetic nervous system activity (SNA), which is required for the acute maintenance of blood pressure (BP). Indeed, in a cohort of young healthy adults, herein we show that intravenous infusion of insulin increases muscle SNA while BP is maintained. We next tested the hypothesis that sympathoexcitation evoked by hyperinsulinemia restrains insulin-stimulated peripheral vasodilation and contributes to sustaining BP. To address this, a separate cohort of participants were subjected to 5-s pulses of neck suction (NS) to simulate carotid hypertension and elicit a reflex-mediated reduction in SNA. NS was conducted before and 60 min following intravenous infusion of insulin. Insulin infusion caused an increase in leg vascular conductance and cardiac output (CO; < 0.050), with maintenance of BP ( = 0.540). As expected, following NS, decreases in BP were greater in the presence of hyperinsulinemia compared with control ( = 0.045). However, the effect of NS on leg vascular conductance did not differ between insulin and control conditions ( = 0.898). Instead, the greater decreases in BP following NS in the setting of insulin infusion paralleled with greater decreases in CO ( = 0.009). These findings support the idea that during hyperinsulinemia, SNA-mediated increase in CO, rather than restraint of leg vascular conductance, is the principal contributor to the maintenance of BP. Demonstration in isolated arteries that insulin suppresses α-adrenergic vasoconstriction suggests that the observed lack of restraint of leg vascular conductance may be attributed to sympatholytic actions of insulin. We examined the role of sympathetic activation in restraining vasodilatory responses to hyperinsulinemia and sustaining blood pressure in healthy adults. Data are reported from two separate experimental protocols in humans and one experimental protocol in isolated arteries from mice. Contrary to our hypothesis, the present findings support the idea that during hyperinsulinemia, a sympathetically mediated increase in cardiac output, rather than restraint of peripheral vasodilation, is the principal contributor to the maintenance of systemic blood pressure.
胰岛素的血管舒张作用支持胰岛素和葡萄糖向骨骼肌的输送。同时,胰岛素发挥中枢作用,增加交感神经系统活动(SNA),这是急性维持血压(BP)所必需的。事实上,在一组年轻健康成年人中,我们在此表明,静脉内输注胰岛素会增加肌肉 SNA,同时维持血压。我们接下来测试了这样一个假设,即高胰岛素血症引起的交感兴奋抑制胰岛素刺激的外周血管舒张,并有助于维持血压。为了解决这个问题,另一组参与者接受了颈部抽吸(NS)的 5 秒脉冲,以模拟颈动脉高血压并引起反射介导的 SNA 降低。在静脉内输注胰岛素之前和之后 60 分钟进行 NS。胰岛素输注引起腿部血管传导率和心输出量(CO)增加(<0.050),同时维持血压(=0.540)。正如预期的那样,与对照相比,在存在高胰岛素血症的情况下,NS 后 BP 的降低更大(=0.045)。然而,在胰岛素和对照条件下,NS 对腿部血管传导率的影响没有差异(=0.898)。相反,在胰岛素输注的情况下,NS 后 BP 的更大降低与 CO 的更大降低平行(=0.009)。这些发现支持这样的观点,即在高胰岛素血症期间,SNA 介导的 CO 增加而不是腿部血管传导率的抑制,是维持血压的主要贡献者。在分离的动脉中证明胰岛素抑制α-肾上腺素能血管收缩表明,观察到的腿部血管传导率的抑制缺乏可能归因于胰岛素的交感神经抑制作用。我们研究了交感神经激活在抑制高胰岛素血症引起的血管舒张反应和维持健康成年人血压中的作用。数据来自人类的两个单独的实验方案和来自小鼠分离动脉的一个实验方案。与我们的假设相反,本研究结果支持这样的观点,即在高胰岛素血症期间,交感神经介导的 CO 增加而不是外周血管舒张的抑制,是维持全身血压的主要贡献者。