Suppr超能文献

链接色成像与白光结肠镜检查在有组织结直肠癌筛查计划中的比较。

Linked-color imaging versus white-light colonoscopy in an organized colorectal cancer screening program.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.

Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):723-730. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.044. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Linked-color imaging (LCI), a new image-enhancing technology emphasizing contrast in mucosal color, has been demonstrated to substantially reduce polyp miss rate as compared with standard white-light imaging (WLI) in tandem colonoscopy studies. Whether LCI increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) remains unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy after fecal immunochemical test (FIT) positivity were 1:1 randomized to undergo colonoscopy with LCI or WLI, both in high-definition systems. Insertion and withdrawal phases of each colonoscopy were carried out using the same assigned light. Experienced endoscopists from 7 Italian centers participated in the study. Randomization was stratified by gender, age, and screening round. The primary outcome measure was represented by ADR.

RESULTS

Of 704 eligible subjects, 649 were included (48.9% men, mean age ± standard deviation, 60.8 ± 7.3 years) and randomized to LCI (n = 326) or WLI (n = 323) colonoscopy. The ADR was higher in the LCI group (51.8%) than in the WLI group (43.7%) (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.40). The proportions of patients with advanced adenomas and sessile serrated lesions were, respectively, 21.2% and 8.6% in the LCI arm and 18.9% and 5.9% in the WLI arm (not significant for both comparisons). At multivariate analysis, LCI was independently associated with ADR, along with male gender, increasing age, and adequate (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score ≥6) bowel preparation. At per-polyp analysis, the mean ± standard deviation number of adenomas per colonoscopy was comparable in the LCI and WLI arms, whereas the corresponding figures for proximal adenomas was significantly higher in the LCI group (.72 ± 1.2 vs .55 ± 1.07, P = .05) CONCLUSIONS: In FIT-positive patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, the routine use of LCI significantly increased the ADR. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03690297.).

摘要

背景与目的

联合显色成像(LCI)是一种新的图像增强技术,强调黏膜颜色对比,与串联结肠镜检查研究中的标准白光成像(WLI)相比,LCI 可显著降低息肉漏诊率。但 LCI 是否会提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)尚不清楚。

方法

连续入组粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阳性后行筛查性结肠镜检查的患者,1:1 随机分配行 LCI 或 WLI 结肠镜检查,均采用高清系统。每例结肠镜检查的进镜和退镜阶段均采用相同的指定光源。7 家意大利中心的经验丰富的内镜医生参与了这项研究。随机分组采用性别、年龄和筛查轮次分层。主要观察指标为 ADR。

结果

704 例合格患者中,649 例纳入研究(48.9%为男性,平均年龄±标准差为 60.8±7.3 岁),并随机分配至 LCI(n=326)或 WLI(n=323)结肠镜组。LCI 组的 ADR 高于 WLI 组(51.8%比 43.7%)(相对风险 1.19;95%置信区间 1.01-1.40)。LCI 组高级别腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状病变的比例分别为 21.2%和 8.6%,WLI 组分别为 18.9%和 5.9%(两项比较均无统计学差异)。多变量分析显示,LCI 与 ADR 独立相关,此外与性别为男性、年龄增加和肠道准备充分(波士顿肠道准备量表评分≥6)相关。在每例息肉分析中,LCI 和 WLI 组每例结肠镜检查的平均±标准差腺瘤数量相当,而 LCI 组近端腺瘤的相应数量显著更高(0.72±1.2 比 0.55±1.07,P=0.05)。

结论

在 FIT 阳性患者行筛查性结肠镜检查中,常规使用 LCI 可显著提高 ADR。(临床试验注册号:NCT03690297.)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验