• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知风险、让步通行卡准入和日常外出参与技术使用:英国老年人的横断面访谈。

Perceived risks, concession travel pass access and everyday technology use for out-of-home participation: cross-sectional interviews among older people in the UK.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society (NVS), Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Fack 23 200, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.

Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01565-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-020-01565-0
PMID:32503429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275447/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The health-promoting qualities of participation as an opportunity for social and cognitive engagement are well known. Use of Everyday Technology such as Smartphones or ATMs, as enabling or disabling factors for out-of-home participation is however under-researched, particularly among older people with and without dementia. Out-of-home participation involves participation in places and activities outside of a person's home, in public space. Situated within the context of an increasingly technological society, the study investigated factors such as perceived risks, access to a concession travel pass and use of Everyday Technologies, and their relationship with out-of-home participation, among older people in the UK.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight older people with and without dementia in urban and rural environments in the UK, were interviewed using the Participation in ACTivities and Places OUTside Home (ACT-OUT) Questionnaire and the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). Associations between Everyday Technology use, perceived risk of falling, functional impairment, access to a concession travel pass and out-of-home participation were investigated using ordinal regression.

RESULTS

A higher probability of Everyday Technology use (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.492; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.041-1.127), perceived risk of falling outside home (OR = 2.499; 95% CI = 1.235-5.053) and, access to a concession travel pass (OR = 3.943; 95% CI = 1.970-7.893) were associated with a higher level of out-of-home participation. However, other types of risk (getting lost; feeling stressed or embarrassed) were not associated with out-of-home participation. Having a functional impairment was associated with a low probability of a higher level of out-of-home participation (OR = .470; 95% CI = .181-1.223). Across the sample, 'outside home' Everyday Technologies were used to a higher degree than 'portable' Everyday Technologies which can be used both in and outside home.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides insights into perceived risks, access to a concession travel pass and use of Everyday Technologies, and their relationship with out-of-home participation, among older people in the UK. Increased knowledge about factors associated with out-of-home participation may help to guide targeted health and social care planning.

摘要

背景

参与社交和认知活动的促进健康的品质是众所周知的。然而,使用日常技术(如智能手机或自动取款机)作为促进或阻碍户外活动参与的因素,在有和没有痴呆症的老年人中研究得还不够充分。户外活动参与是指在一个人的家以外的地方和活动中参与,在公共空间中。本研究在日益技术化的社会背景下,调查了英国老年人中,感知风险、获得优惠旅行通行证和使用日常技术等因素,以及它们与户外活动参与的关系。

方法

在英国的城市和农村环境中,对 128 名患有和不患有痴呆症的老年人进行了访谈,使用了《活动和场所外参与(ACT-OUT)问卷》和《日常技术使用问卷(ETUQ)》。使用有序回归分析了日常技术使用、跌倒感知风险、功能障碍、获得优惠旅行通行证与户外活动参与之间的关系。

结果

更高的日常技术使用率(优势比[OR] = 1.492;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.041-1.127)、户外活动中跌倒的感知风险(OR = 2.499;95% CI = 1.235-5.053)和获得优惠旅行通行证(OR = 3.943;95% CI = 1.970-7.893)与更高水平的户外活动参与相关。然而,其他类型的风险(迷路、感到压力或尴尬)与户外活动参与无关。功能障碍与较低水平的户外活动参与可能性相关(OR = 0.470;95% CI = 0.181-1.223)。在整个样本中,“户外活动”日常技术的使用率高于“便携式”日常技术,后者既可以在室内也可以在室外使用。

结论

本研究提供了英国老年人中感知风险、获得优惠旅行通行证和使用日常技术及其与户外活动参与的关系的见解。增加对户外活动参与相关因素的了解,可能有助于指导有针对性的卫生和社会保健规划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d9/7275447/2a9ccadf0862/12877_2020_1565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d9/7275447/2a9ccadf0862/12877_2020_1565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d9/7275447/2a9ccadf0862/12877_2020_1565_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived risks, concession travel pass access and everyday technology use for out-of-home participation: cross-sectional interviews among older people in the UK.感知风险、让步通行卡准入和日常外出参与技术使用:英国老年人的横断面访谈。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01565-0.
2
Everyday technologies and public space participation among people with and without dementia.日常技术与痴呆症患者及非痴呆症患者的公共空间参与度
Can J Occup Ther. 2019 Dec;86(5):400-411. doi: 10.1177/0008417419837764. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Gender and diagnostic impact on everyday technology use: a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ).性别和诊断对日常技术使用的影响:日常技术使用问卷(ETUQ)的差异项目功能(DIF)分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Nov;41(22):2688-2694. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1472816. Epub 2018 May 22.
4
Social Participation in Relation to Technology Use and Social Deprivation: A Mixed Methods Study Among Older People with and without Dementia.社会参与与技术使用和社会剥夺的关系:一项针对有和没有痴呆症的老年人的混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114022.
5
Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer's disease? - a pilot study.日常技术使用问卷能否预测轻度认知障碍或轻度阿尔茨海默病老年患者的整体功能水平?——一项试点研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):201-209. doi: 10.1111/scs.12330. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits.有或无认知缺陷的老年人在日常技术使用中所感知到的困难。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16(4):216-26. doi: 10.3109/11038120802684299.
7
Out-of-home participation among people living with dementia: A study in four countries.痴呆症患者的户外参与情况:一项四国研究。
Dementia (London). 2022 Jul;21(5):1636-1652. doi: 10.1177/14713012221084173. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
8
Participation after acquired brain injury: Associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life.脑损伤后的参与度:与日常技术和日常生活活动的关联
Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(5):366-76. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1011229. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
9
Do you observe what I perceive? The relationship between two perspectives on the ability of people with cognitive impairments to use everyday technology.你是否察觉到我所感知到的?关于认知障碍者使用日常技术能力的两种观点之间的关系。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Aug;24(8):1295-1305. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1609902. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire.瑞典、美国和英国对日常技术的感知挑战:探索日常技术使用问卷中的差异项目功能。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov;27(8):554-566. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1723685. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Dementia-Friendly Transportation Services: A Scoping Review.痴呆症友好型交通服务:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae047.
2
Out-of-home participation among people living with dementia: A study in four countries.痴呆症患者的户外参与情况:一项四国研究。
Dementia (London). 2022 Jul;21(5):1636-1652. doi: 10.1177/14713012221084173. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
3
Social Participation in Relation to Technology Use and Social Deprivation: A Mixed Methods Study Among Older People with and without Dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
Everyday technologies and public space participation among people with and without dementia.日常技术与痴呆症患者及非痴呆症患者的公共空间参与度
Can J Occup Ther. 2019 Dec;86(5):400-411. doi: 10.1177/0008417419837764. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Development of a Questionnaire to Evaluate Out-of-Home Participation for People With Dementia.一份用于评估痴呆症患者户外参与情况的问卷的编制
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;73(1):7301205030p1-7301205030p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.027144.
3
'O': Using walking interviews to learn about the lived experience and meaning of neighbourhood for people living with dementia.
社会参与与技术使用和社会剥夺的关系:一项针对有和没有痴呆症的老年人的混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114022.
“O”:采用步行访谈的方式,了解患有痴呆症的人对居住社区的生活体验和意义的看法。
Dementia (London). 2020 Oct;19(7):2199-2219. doi: 10.1177/1471301218817453. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Social Isolation and Cognitive Function in Later Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社交隔离与晚年认知功能:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(s1):S119-S144. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180501.
5
The contrasting role of technology as both supportive and hindering in the everyday lives of people with mild cognitive deficits: a focus group study.技术在轻度认知障碍者日常生活中扮演的支持与阻碍的对比角色:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0879-z.
6
The experience of lived space in persons with dementia: a systematic meta-synthesis.痴呆症患者生活空间体验的系统元分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 1;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0728-0.
7
Ordinal logistic regression.有序逻辑回归
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jan;153(1):157-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.011.
8
Review of Public Transport Needs of Older People in European Context.欧洲背景下老年人公共交通需求综述
J Popul Ageing. 2017;10(4):343-361. doi: 10.1007/s12062-016-9168-9. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study.老年人对技术的认知以及与平板电脑交互的障碍:一项焦点小组研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687.
10
A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt).一个用于解释老年消费者智能技术采用行为的理论模型(Elderadopt)。
J Aging Stud. 2017 Aug;42:56-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 15.