National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Department of Medical Oncology, Program for Ethics and Patient-Oriented Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld University, School of Public Health, PO box 10 01 31, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07028-4.
Financial toxicity of cancer has so far been discussed primarily in the US health care system and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. In European health care systems, the socio-economic impact of cancer is poorly understood. This study investigates the financial burden and patient-reported outcomes of neuroendocrine (NET) or colorectal (CRC) cancer patients at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center.
This prospective cross-sectional study surveyed 247 advanced stage patients (n = 122 NET/n = 125 CRC) at the National Center for Tumor Diseases, in Germany about cancer-related out-of-pocket costs, income loss, distress, and quality of life. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to demonstrate the effects of economic deterioration on patients' quality of life and distress.
81% (n = 199) of the patients reported out-of-pocket costs, and 37% (n = 92) income loss as a consequence of their disease. While monthly out-of-pocket costs did not exceed 200€ in 77% of affected patients, 24% of those with income losses reported losing more than 1.200€ per month. High financial loss relative to income was significantly associated with patients' reporting a worse quality of life (p < .05) and more distress (p < .05).
Financial toxicity in third-party payer health care systems like Germany is caused rather by income loss than by co-payments. Distress and reduced quality of life due to financial problems seem to amplify the burden that already results from a cancer diagnosis and treatment. If confirmed at a broader scale, there is a need for targeted support measures at the individual and system level.
癌症的经济毒性迄今为止主要在美国医疗体系中进行了讨论,与更高的发病率和死亡率相关。在欧洲医疗体系中,癌症的社会经济影响尚未得到充分理解。本研究调查了德国综合癌症中心神经内分泌(NET)或结直肠(CRC)癌症患者的经济负担和患者报告的结局。
本前瞻性横断面研究在德国国家肿瘤疾病中心调查了 247 名晚期患者(NET 患者 n=122,CRC 患者 n=125),调查癌症相关自付费用、收入损失、痛苦和生活质量。采用多元线性回归分析来证明经济恶化对患者生活质量和痛苦的影响。
81%(n=199)的患者报告了自付费用,37%(n=92)的患者因疾病而收入损失。虽然 77%的受影响患者每月自付费用不超过 200 欧元,但 24%的收入损失患者报告每月损失超过 1200 欧元。相对于收入的高财务损失与患者报告的生活质量更差(p<0.05)和更多痛苦(p<0.05)显著相关。
在第三方付费医疗体系(如德国)中,经济毒性更多地是由收入损失而不是共同支付造成的。由于经济问题导致的痛苦和生活质量下降似乎加剧了癌症诊断和治疗已经带来的负担。如果在更大范围内得到证实,则需要在个人和系统层面采取有针对性的支持措施。