• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的关于人工流产相关内容的可读性:一项横断面研究。

Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

The Swedish Red Cross University College, Huddinge, Sweden.

Department of Clinical science, Intervention and technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01132-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-01132-y
PMID:32503524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275615/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-quality information is essential if clients who request an abortion are to reach informed decisions and feel prepared for the procedure, but little is known concerning the readability of web-based sources containing such material. The aim was to investigate the readability of web-based information about induced abortion.

METHODS

The search engine Google was used to identify web pages about induced abortion, written in the English language. A total of 240 hits were screened and 236 web pages fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After correcting for duplicate hits, 185 web pages were included. The readability of the text-based content of each web page was determined with Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Flesch Reading Ease. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test as post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Across all grade level measures, a small minority of the web pages had a readability corresponding to elementary school (n < 3, 1%), while the majority had readability corresponding to senior high school or above (n > 153, 65%). The means of the grade level measures ranged between 10.5 and 13.1, and the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 45.3 (SD 13.6). Only weak correlations (rho < 0.2) were found between the readability measures and search rank in the hit lists. Consistently, web pages affiliated with health care had the least difficult readability and those affiliated with scientific sources had the most difficult readability.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, web-based information about induced abortions has difficult readability. Incentives are needed to improve the readability of these texts and ensure that clients encounter understandable information so that they may reach informed decisions and feel adequately prepared when requesting an abortion.

摘要

背景

如果寻求堕胎的客户能够做出知情决策并为手术做好准备,那么高质量的信息至关重要,但对于包含此类材料的基于网络的资源的可读性知之甚少。本研究旨在调查关于诱导性堕胎的基于网络的信息的可读性。

方法

使用搜索引擎 Google 来识别关于诱导性堕胎的英文网页。总共筛选出 240 个搜索结果,其中 236 个网页符合纳入标准。在纠正重复搜索结果后,共纳入 185 个网页。使用 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、Gunning Fog 指数、Coleman-Liau 指数、简单测词法和 Flesch 阅读舒适度来确定每个网页的文本内容的可读性。使用描述性统计、Pearson 相关系数和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验与 Dunn 事后检验分析数据。

结果

在所有年级水平指标中,极少数网页的可读性相当于小学(n<3,1%),而大多数网页的可读性相当于高中或以上(n>153,65%)。年级水平指标的平均值在 10.5 到 13.1 之间,Flesch 阅读舒适度的平均值为 45.3(SD 13.6)。可读性指标与搜索排名之间仅存在微弱的相关性(rho<0.2)。与医疗保健相关的网页的可读性最低,而与科学来源相关的网页的可读性最高。

结论

总体而言,关于诱导性堕胎的基于网络的信息具有较高的可读性。需要采取激励措施来提高这些文本的可读性,以确保客户能够遇到易懂的信息,从而使他们能够做出知情决策,并在请求堕胎时感到充分准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6385/7275615/ad88681c0278/12911_2020_1132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6385/7275615/ad88681c0278/12911_2020_1132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6385/7275615/ad88681c0278/12911_2020_1132_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.基于网络的关于人工流产相关内容的可读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01132-y.
2
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Online nutrition information for pregnant women: a content analysis.孕妇在线营养信息:一项内容分析
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12315. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.维基百科上自身免疫性疾病页面的可读性:系统定量评估
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 18;19(7):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8225.
7
Evaluating the readability of online testosterone search results.评估在线睾酮搜索结果的可读性。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Jun;36(4):399-402. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00682-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)相关互联网患者信息的质量、准确性和可读性分析:一项横断面研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 May 15;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01100-x.
9
Quality of web pages about second-trimester medical abortion: A cross-sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency.网页质量关于中期妊娠药物流产:横断面研究可读性、全面性和透明度。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2683-2691. doi: 10.1111/jan.14080. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.早产儿视网膜病变相关信息在网络上的易读性、理解度和质量。
Birth Defects Res. 2021 Jul 15;113(12):901-910. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1883. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Health Professional Mentorship Platform to Improve Equitable Access to Abortion: Development, Usability, and Content Evaluation.一个改善堕胎公平可及性的卫生专业人员指导平台:开发、可用性和内容评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 19;12:e63364. doi: 10.2196/63364.
2
Higher readability of institutional websites drives the correct fruition of the abortion pathway: A cross-sectional study.医疗机构网站的可读性越高,越有助于正确实施堕胎流程:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0277342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277342. eCollection 2022.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability and Understandability Analysis of Online Materials Related to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.腹主动脉瘤修复相关在线材料的可读性和可理解性分析
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Feb;54(2):111-117. doi: 10.1177/1538574419879855. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
2
Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison.骨关节炎在线信息的可读性与质量:基于历史比较的客观分析
Interact J Med Res. 2019 Sep 16;8(3):e12855. doi: 10.2196/12855.
3
Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
关于糖尿病视网膜病变的面向患者的免费在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 1;137(11):1240-1245. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3116.
4
Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study.与堕胎相关的担忧、恐惧和准备情况:一项基于瑞典网络的探索性和回顾性定性研究。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Oct;24(5):380-389. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1647334. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Quality of web pages about second-trimester medical abortion: A cross-sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency.网页质量关于中期妊娠药物流产:横断面研究可读性、全面性和透明度。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2683-2691. doi: 10.1111/jan.14080. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia.互联网上与分娩镇痛相关的患者教育材料的可读性、内容、质量和准确性评估。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.对与氟化物相关的在线材料可读性的评估。
J Prev Interv Community. 2019 Jan-Mar;47(1):5-13. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2018.1547304.
8
Readibility, Understandability, and Quality of Online Education Materials for Vocal Fold Nodules.声带小结的在线教育材料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
J Voice. 2020 Mar;34(2):302.e15-302.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Women's experiences of labour and birth when having a termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality in the second trimester of pregnancy: A qualitative meta-synthesis.妊娠中期因胎儿异常而终止妊娠时女性的分娩经历:一项定性元分析。
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
10
Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues.关于药物性中期妊娠流产的患者信息网站:质量、适用性及问题的描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 10;19(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6380.