Suppr超能文献

真空吸引术使用不足:达累斯萨拉姆一家大学医院医护人员的观点

Low use of vacuum extraction: Health care Professionals' Perspective in a University Hospital, Dar es Salaam.

作者信息

Makokha-Sandell Henrik, Mgaya Andrew, Belachew Johanna, Litorp Helena, Hussein Kidanto, Essén Birgitta

机构信息

International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Department of women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden.

International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Department of women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden; Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science, P.O. Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Oct;25:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100533. Epub 2020 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of vacuum extraction (VE) has been declining in low and middle income countries. At the highest referral hospital Tanzania, 54% of deliveries are performed by caesarean section (CS) and only 0.8% by VE. Use of VE has the potential to reduce CS rates and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes but causes for its low use is not fully explored.

METHOD

During November and December of 2017 participatory observations, semi-structured in-depth interviews (n = 29) and focus group discussions (n = 2) were held with midwives, residents and specialists working at the highest referral hospital in Tanzania. Thematic analysis was used to identify rationales for low VE use.

FINDINGS

Unstructured and inconsistent clinical teaching structure, interdependent on a fear and blame culture, as well as financial incentives and a lack of structured, adhered to and updated guidelines were identified as rationales for CS instead of VE use. Although all informants showed positivity towards clinical teaching of VE, a subpar communication between clinics and academia was stated as resulting in absent clinical teachers and unaccountable students.

CONCLUSION

This study draws connections between the low use of VE and the inconsistent and unstructured clinical training of VE expressed through the health care providers' points of view. However, clinical teaching in VE was highly welcomed by the informers which may serve as a good starting point for future interventions.

摘要

背景

在低收入和中等收入国家,真空吸引术(VE)的使用一直在减少。在坦桑尼亚最高级别的转诊医院,54%的分娩通过剖宫产(CS)进行,只有0.8%通过真空吸引术进行。真空吸引术有可能降低剖宫产率并改善孕产妇和新生儿结局,但其使用率低的原因尚未得到充分探讨。

方法

2017年11月和12月期间,对在坦桑尼亚最高转诊医院工作的助产士、住院医师和专家进行了参与性观察、半结构化深度访谈(n = 29)和焦点小组讨论(n = 2)。采用主题分析法确定真空吸引术使用率低的原因。

结果

非结构化且不一致的临床教学结构、依赖于恐惧和责备文化、经济激励措施以及缺乏结构化、遵守和更新的指南被确定为选择剖宫产而非真空吸引术的原因。尽管所有受访者对真空吸引术的临床教学都表现出积极态度,但指出临床机构与学术界之间的沟通不佳导致临床教师缺席且学生无人负责。

结论

本研究从医疗服务提供者的角度阐述了真空吸引术使用率低与真空吸引术临床培训不一致和缺乏结构化之间的联系。然而,受访者对真空吸引术的临床教学非常欢迎,这可能是未来干预措施的一个良好起点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验