Dominico Sunday, Kasanga Mkambu, Mwakatundu Nguke, Chaote Paul, Lobis Samantha, Bailey Patricia E
Thamini Uhai, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
President's Office-Regional Administration and Local Government, Dodoma, Tanzania.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03738-0.
Vacuum-assisted birth is not widely practiced in Tanzania but efforts to re-introduce the procedure suggest some success. Few studies have targeted childbirth attendants to learn how their perceptions of and training experiences with the procedure affect practice. This study explores a largely rural cohort of health providers to determine associations between recent practice of the procedure and training, individual and contextual factors.
A cross-sectional knowledge, attitudes and practice survey of 297 providers was conducted in 2019 at 3 hospitals and 12 health centers that provided comprehensive emergency obstetric care. We used descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression to model the probability of having performed a vacuum extraction in the last 3 months.
Providers were roughly split between working in maternity units in hospitals and health centers. They included: medical doctors, assistant medical officers (14%); clinical officers (10%); nurse officers, assistant nurse officers, registered nurses (32%); and enrolled nurses (44%). Eighty percent reported either pre-service, in-service vacuum extraction training or both, but only 31% reported conducting a vacuum-assisted birth in the last 3 months. Based on 11 training and enabling factors, a positive association with recent practice was observed; the single most promising factor was hands-on solo practice during in-service training (66% of providers with this experience had conducted vacuum extraction in the last 3 months). The logistic regression model showed that providers exposed to 7-9 training modalities were 7.8 times more likely to have performed vacuum extraction than those exposed to fewer training opportunities (AOR = 7.78, 95% CI: 4.169-14.524). Providers who worked in administrative councils other than Kigoma Municipality were 2.7 times more likely to have conducted vacuum extraction than their colleagues in Kigoma Municipality (AOR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.023-6.976). Similarly, providers posted in a health center compared to those in a hospital were twice as likely to have conducted a recent vacuum extraction (AOR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.153-3.850), and finally, male providers were twice as likely as their female colleagues to have performed this procedure recently (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.072-3.55).
Training and location of posting were associated with recent practice of vacuum extraction. Multiple training modalities appear to predict recent practice but hands-on experience during training may be the most critical component. We recommend a low-dose high frequency strategy to skills building with simulation and e-learning. A gender integrated approach to training may help ensure female trainees are exposed to critical training components.
真空辅助分娩在坦桑尼亚并未广泛应用,但重新引入该程序的努力已取得了一些成效。很少有研究针对分娩护理人员,以了解他们对该程序的认知以及培训经历如何影响实际操作。本研究对大量农村地区的医疗服务提供者进行了调查,以确定该程序近期的实际操作与培训、个人及环境因素之间的关联。
2019年,在3家医院和12个提供全面紧急产科护理的健康中心,对297名医疗服务提供者进行了横断面知识、态度和实践调查。我们使用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归模型来模拟过去3个月内进行真空吸引术的概率。
医疗服务提供者大致分为在医院产科病房和健康中心工作两类。他们包括:医生、助理医务人员(14%);临床干事(10%);护士、助理护士、注册护士(32%);以及在册护士(44%)。80%的人报告接受过职前、在职真空吸引术培训或两者都接受过,但只有31%的人报告在过去3个月内进行过真空辅助分娩。基于11个培训和促成因素,观察到与近期实践存在正相关;最有希望的单一因素是在职培训期间的实际单人操作(有此经历的提供者中,66%在过去3个月内进行过真空吸引术)。逻辑回归模型显示,接触7 - 9种培训方式的提供者进行真空吸引术的可能性比接触较少培训机会的提供者高7.8倍(调整后比值比[AOR]=7.78,95%置信区间[CI]:4.169 - 14.524)。在基戈马市以外的行政区工作的提供者进行真空吸引术的可能性是基戈马市同事的2.7倍(AOR = 2.67,95% CI:1.023 - 6.976)。同样,与在医院工作的提供者相比,在健康中心工作的提供者近期进行真空吸引术的可能性是其两倍(AOR = 2.11,95% CI:1.153 - 3.850),最后,男性提供者近期进行该操作的可能性是女性同事的两倍(AOR = 1.95,95% CI:1.072 - 3.55)。
培训和工作地点与近期真空吸引术的实践相关。多种培训方式似乎可以预测近期实践,但培训期间的实际操作经验可能是最关键的因素。我们建议采用低剂量高频策略进行技能培养,包括模拟和电子学习。采用性别融合的培训方法可能有助于确保女性学员接触到关键的培训内容。