Effectiveness of tonifying-kidney and regulating-liver therapy on diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Traditional Chinese Medicine tonifying-kidney and regulating-liver therapy on diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).

METHODS

The literature was comprehensively searched up to August 2019 using four Chinese and three English electronic databases to extract randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing Traditional Chinese Medicine tonifying-kidney and regulating-liver prescriptions (combined with hormone therapy or not) with Western Medicine. Data quality evaluation was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using Revman 5.3 software with effect estimates presented as mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of nine RCTs with 512 participants were extracted and eligible for Meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between Chinese medicine and Western Medicine on basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level (MD 0.11, 95% CI －0.52 to 0.74, 392 participants, seven trials), anti-Müllerian hormone level (MD 0.48, 95% CI －0.62 to 1.58, 95 participants, two trials), and the FSH and luteinizing hormone ratio (MD 0.01, 95% CI －0.95 to 0.96, 115 participants, two trials). Chinese medicine was more effective at improving Traditional Chinese Medicine symptom scores (TCMSS) (MD －2.39, 95% CI －3.83 to －0.94, 160 participants, three trials), effective rate of TCMSS (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36, 160 participants, three trials), antral follicle count (AFC) (MD 0.55, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.04, 155 participants, three trials), and FSH levels at 3 months post-treatment (MD -4.77, 95% CI －6.09 to －3.45, 137 participants, two trials).

CONCLUSION

Compared with Western Medicine, tonifying-kidney and regulating-liver therapy is more effective at relieving symptoms and improving AFC and FSH at 3 months post-treatment.