• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将急诊室入院时测得的乳酸水平纳入创伤结局预测模型可改善死亡率预测:一项回顾性单中心研究。

Inclusion of lactate level measured upon emergency room arrival in trauma outcome prediction models improves mortality prediction: a retrospective, single-center study.

作者信息

Moon Jonghwan, Hwang Kyungjin, Yoon Dukyong, Jung Kyoungwon

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Acute Crit Care. 2020 May;35(2):102-109. doi: 10.4266/acc.2019.00780. Epub 2020 May 31.

DOI:10.4266/acc.2019.00780
PMID:32506875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280791/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop a model for predicting trauma outcomes by adding arterial lactate levels measured upon emergency room (ER) arrival to existing trauma injury severity scoring systems.

METHODS

We examined blunt trauma cases that were admitted to our hospital during 2010- 2014. Eligibility criteria were cases with an Injury Severity Score of ≥9, complete Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) variable data, and lactate levels that were assessed upon ER arrival. Survivor and non-survivor groups were compared and lactate-based prediction models were generated using logistic regression. We compared the predictive performances of traditional prediction models (Revised Trauma Score [RTS] and TRISS) and lactate-based models using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

We included 829 patients, and the in-hospital mortality rate among these patients was 21.6%. The model that used lactate levels and age provided a significantly better AUC value than the RTS model. The model with lactate added to the TRISS variables provided the highest Youden J statistic, with 86.0% sensitivity and 70.8% specificity at a cutoff value of 0.15, as well as the highest predictive value, with a significantly higher AUC than the TRISS.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that lactate testing upon ER arrival may help supplement or replace traditional physiological parameters to predict mortality outcomes among Korean trauma patients. Adding lactate levels also appears to improve the predictive abilities of existing trauma outcome prediction models.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过将急诊室(ER)就诊时测得的动脉血乳酸水平添加到现有的创伤损伤严重程度评分系统中,开发一种预测创伤结局的模型。

方法

我们检查了2010年至2014年期间入住我院的钝性创伤病例。纳入标准为损伤严重程度评分≥9分、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)变量数据完整且在ER就诊时评估了乳酸水平的病例。比较存活组和非存活组,并使用逻辑回归生成基于乳酸的预测模型。我们使用受试者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)比较了传统预测模型(修订创伤评分[RTS]和TRISS)与基于乳酸的模型的预测性能。

结果

我们纳入了829例患者,这些患者的院内死亡率为21.6%。使用乳酸水平和年龄的模型提供的AUC值明显优于RTS模型。在TRISS变量中添加乳酸的模型提供了最高的约登J统计量,在临界值为0.15时,灵敏度为86.0%,特异度为70.8%,以及最高的预测价值,其AUC明显高于TRISS。

结论

这些发现表明,ER就诊时进行乳酸检测可能有助于补充或替代传统生理参数,以预测韩国创伤患者的死亡率结局。添加乳酸水平似乎也能提高现有创伤结局预测模型的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/b71e9dee6ecf/acc-2019-00780f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/8999171718ba/acc-2019-00780f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/302dfcfbf5f0/acc-2019-00780f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/b71e9dee6ecf/acc-2019-00780f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/8999171718ba/acc-2019-00780f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/302dfcfbf5f0/acc-2019-00780f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1013/7280791/b71e9dee6ecf/acc-2019-00780f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Inclusion of lactate level measured upon emergency room arrival in trauma outcome prediction models improves mortality prediction: a retrospective, single-center study.将急诊室入院时测得的乳酸水平纳入创伤结局预测模型可改善死亡率预测:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Acute Crit Care. 2020 May;35(2):102-109. doi: 10.4266/acc.2019.00780. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Comparison of the trauma and injury severity score and modified early warning score with rapid lactate level (the ViEWS-L score) in blunt trauma patients.比较创伤和损伤严重程度评分与改良早期预警评分与快速乳酸水平(ViEWS-L 评分)在钝性创伤患者中的应用。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836192d6.
3
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.
4
The Revised Trauma Score plus serum albumin level improves the prediction of mortality in trauma patients.修订创伤评分加上血清白蛋白水平可改善对创伤患者死亡率的预测。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1882-1886. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5
Predicting Outcomes of Penetrating Cardiovascular Injuries at a Rural Center by Different Scoring Systems.通过不同评分系统预测农村中心穿透性心血管损伤的结局
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):198-205. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0403.
6
Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?严重创伤后院内死亡率的预测:哪种院前评分最准确?
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.035. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Prediction of outcome in intensive care unit trauma patients: a multicenter study of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and a 24-hour intensive care unit (ICU) point system.重症监护病房创伤患者预后的预测:急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)以及24小时重症监护病房(ICU)评分系统的多中心研究
J Trauma. 1999 Aug;47(2):324-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199908000-00017.
8
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
9
Validation of the trauma mortality prediction scores from a Malaysian population.马来西亚人群创伤死亡率预测评分的验证
Burns Trauma. 2017 Dec 22;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0102-z. eCollection 2017.
10
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised.创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)修订版。
Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Observational Analysis of Point-of-Care Lactate Plus™ Meter in Preclinical Trauma Models.临床前创伤模型中即时检测乳酸Plus™血糖仪的观察性分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;14(23):2641. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232641.
2
Plasma interleukin responses as predictors of outcome stratification in patients after major trauma: a prospective observational two centre study.血浆白细胞介素反应作为预测严重创伤后患者预后分层的指标:一项前瞻性观察性的两中心研究。
Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1276171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1276171. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality prediction models in the general trauma population: A systematic review.普通创伤人群的死亡率预测模型:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
2
Prehospital point-of-care lactate following trauma: A systematic review.创伤后院前即时检测乳酸:一项系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Oct;81(4):748-55. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001192.
3
Do lactate levels in the emergency department predict outcome in adult trauma patients? A systematic review.急诊科的乳酸水平能否预测成年创伤患者的预后?一项系统综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):555-66. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001156.
4
The Applicability of Trauma and Injury Severity Score for a Blunt Trauma Population in Korea and a Proposal of New Models Using Score Predictors.创伤和损伤严重程度评分在韩国钝性创伤人群中的适用性及使用评分预测指标的新模型建议
Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):728-34. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.728.
5
The predictive value of initial serum lactate in trauma patients.创伤患者初始血清乳酸的预测价值。
Shock. 2014 Sep;42(3):199-204. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000208.
6
Is the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM-ICD-9) a valid predictor of mortality in pediatric trauma patients?创伤死亡率预测模型(TMPM-ICD-9)是否能有效预测儿科创伤患者的死亡率?
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jan;49(1):189-92; discussions 192. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.09.055. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
A comparison of the Injury Severity Score and the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model.损伤严重度评分与创伤死亡率预测模型的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):47-52; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0d5d.
8
Should the IDC-9 Trauma Mortality Prediction Model become the new paradigm for benchmarking trauma outcomes?IDC-9 创伤死亡率预测模型是否应成为创伤结局基准的新范例?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1695-701. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256a010.
9
Admission base deficit and lactate levels in Canadian patients with blunt trauma: are they useful markers of mortality?加拿大钝器创伤患者的入院基础不足和乳酸水平:它们是死亡率的有用标志物吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1532-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dd5a.
10
Mortality risk stratification in elderly trauma patients based on initial arterial lactate and base deficit levels.基于初始动脉血乳酸和碱缺失水平的老年创伤患者死亡风险分层
Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1337-41.