Suppr超能文献

高剂量维生素 C 治疗肿瘤患者的意外后果:评估抗坏血酸对三种医院用血糖仪的干扰。

Unintended Consequence of High-Dose Vitamin C Therapy for an Oncology Patient: Evaluation of Ascorbic Acid Interference With Three Hospital-Use Glucose Meters.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Gundersen Lutheran Health Care System, LaCrosse, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jul;15(4):897-900. doi: 10.1177/1932296820932186. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

The use of high-dose vitamin C in cancer care has offered promising results for some patients. However, the intravenous (IV) doses used for these patients can reach concentrations that interfere with some strip-based glucose meters. We characterized the impact of vitamin C interference, from standard to the very high doses used for some cancer protocols, using three different hospital-use glucose meters. For two of the three devices tested, increasing concentrations of ascorbic acid caused false elevations in the glucose measurements. The third glucose meter did not provide inaccurate results, regardless of the vitamin C concentration present. Rather, above a certain threshold, the device generated error messages and no results could be obtained.

摘要

高剂量维生素 C 在癌症治疗中的应用为一些患者带来了有希望的结果。然而,这些患者使用的静脉内(IV)剂量可达到干扰一些条带式血糖仪的浓度。我们使用三种不同的医院用血糖仪来描述维生素 C 干扰的影响,从标准剂量到一些癌症方案中使用的非常高剂量。在所测试的三种设备中的两种中,随着抗坏血酸浓度的增加,导致葡萄糖测量值的假性升高。第三种血糖仪无论存在多少维生素 C 浓度,都不会提供不准确的结果。相反,超过一定阈值,该设备会生成错误消息,并且无法获得结果。

相似文献

3
Traditional Interference Experiments vs. Method Comparison Interference Experiments.传统干扰实验与方法比较干扰实验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):517-520. doi: 10.1177/19322968211059548. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
The impact of high-dose vitamin C on blood glucose testing in ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging.
J Nucl Med Technol. 2015 Mar;43(1):70-1. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.114.140335. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

3
Interferences With CGM Systems: Practical Relevance?对连续血糖监测系统的干扰:实际相关性?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):271-274. doi: 10.1177/19322968211065065. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
4
Traditional Interference Experiments vs. Method Comparison Interference Experiments.传统干扰实验与方法比较干扰实验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):517-520. doi: 10.1177/19322968211059548. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验