• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非药物干预措施可改善急诊科老年患者的舒适度和体验。

Non-pharmacologic interventions improve comfort and experience among older adults in the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;39:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.089. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.089
PMID:32507574
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine if a comfort cart would improve older adults' comfort and facilitate communication during Emergency Department (ED) visits.

METHODS

A comfort cart containing low-cost, non-pharmacological interventions to improve patient comfort and ability to communicate (e.g., hearing amplifiers, reading glasses) were made available to patients aged ≥65 years. Patients and clinicians were surveyed to assess effectiveness. We followed the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients and 100 providers were surveyed. Among patients, 98.0%, 95.1%, and 67.5% somewhat or strongly agreed that the comfort cart improved comfort, overall experience, and independence, respectively. Among providers, 97.0%, 95.0%, 87.0%, and 83% somewhat or strongly agreed that the comfort cart provided comfort, improved patient satisfaction, increased ability to give compassionate care, and increased patient orientation.

CONCLUSION

The comfort cart was an affordable and effective intervention that improved patients' comfort by facilitating communication, wellbeing, and compassionate care delivery.

摘要

目的

确定舒适推车是否能提高老年人在急诊科就诊时的舒适度并促进沟通。

方法

为年龄≥65 岁的患者提供了一个装有低成本、非药物干预措施的舒适推车,以改善患者的舒适度和沟通能力(例如,助听器、阅读眼镜)。对患者和临床医生进行了调查以评估其效果。我们遵循了《质量改进报告卓越标准:SQUIRE 2.0 指南》。

结果

对 300 名患者和 100 名医务人员进行了调查。在患者中,分别有 98.0%、95.1%和 67.5%的患者表示舒适推车在一定程度上或强烈地改善了舒适度、整体体验和独立性。在医务人员中,分别有 97.0%、95.0%、87.0%和 83%的医务人员表示舒适推车提供了舒适、提高了患者满意度、增加了给予同情关怀的能力以及增加了患者的适应能力。

结论

舒适推车是一种经济实惠且有效的干预措施,通过促进沟通、幸福感和同情关怀的提供,提高了患者的舒适度。

相似文献

1
Non-pharmacologic interventions improve comfort and experience among older adults in the Emergency Department.非药物干预措施可改善急诊科老年患者的舒适度和体验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;39:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.089. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Interventions to improve older adults' Emergency Department patient experience: A systematic review.改善老年人急诊科患者体验的干预措施:系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;38(6):1257-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Caring for Children With Medical Complexity With the Emergency Information Form.通过紧急信息表照顾患有复杂疾病的儿童。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Jan;36(1):57-61. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002021.
4
"Why Is This Patient Being Sent Here?": Communication from Urgent Care to the Emergency Department.“为何将该患者送来此处?”:从紧急护理部门到急诊科的沟通
J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
5
A survey of emergency department staff about challenges and recommendations for emergency department care of extended care facility patients.一项关于急诊科工作人员在长期护理机构患者的急诊科护理方面面临的挑战和建议的调查。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
A multifaceted intervention improves patient satisfaction and perceptions of emergency department care.多方面的干预可提高患者满意度及对急诊科护理的认知。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Jun;18(3):238-45. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl002. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
8
Assessment of Patient-Centered Approaches to Collect Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Information in the Emergency Department: The EQUALITY Study.评估急诊科以患者为中心的方法收集性取向和性别认同信息:EQUALITY 研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186506. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6506.
9
Quality improvement initiative for improved patient communication in an ED rapid assessment zone.改善 ED 快速评估区患者沟通的质量改进措施。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):811-818. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209124. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Interventions to improve patient-centered care during times of emergency department crowding.在急诊科拥挤时改善以患者为中心的护理的干预措施。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01224.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of the emergency department environment: a qualitative study with caregivers of people with dementia.急诊科环境体验:一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的定性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03797-z.
2
A Qualitative Study of Emergency Department Delirium Prevention Initiatives.急诊科谵妄预防措施的定性研究
Delirium Commun. 2022;2022. doi: 10.56392/001c.55690. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
3
Emergency Department Policies to Improve Care Experiences for Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.急诊科改善 COVID-19 大流行期间老年人护理体验的政策
J Geriatr Emerg Med. 2022 Summer;3(2). doi: 10.17294/2694-4715.1031. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians position statement on care of older people in Canadian Emergency Departments: executive summary.加拿大急诊医师协会关于加拿大急诊科老年患者护理的立场声明:执行摘要。
CJEM. 2022 Jun;24(4):376-381. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00315-y. Epub 2022 May 9.