Ardila Carlos M, Flórez-Flórez Juliana, Castañeda-Parra Luis-David, Guzmán Isabel C, Bedoya-García Jader A
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(8):612-621. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44715.
Adjunctive antimicrobials improve probing depth and clinical attachment loss compared with subgingival debridement (SD) alone in patients with aggressive periodontitis. The microbiologic and clinical effectiveness of moxifloxacin (MOX) and amoxicillin plus metronidazole (AMOX+ME) as adjunctive therapies for generalized aggressive periodontitis were compared.
This pilot randomized controlled clinical trial included 36 patients who were assigned to one of three therapy groups: SD plus systemic MOX (400 mg QD for 7 days), SD plus systemic AMOX+ME (500 mg TID each for 7 days), or SD plus placebo. Probing depth, clinical attachment loss, bleeding on probing, and plaque were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Subgingival plaque samples were analyzed.
All treatments resulted in significant probing depth and clinical attachment loss reduction compared with the baseline values (P < .0001 for all), with the effects still present at 6 months posttreatment, but the patients taking antibiotic protocols presented the most significant gains (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in the occurrence of gingival pockets ≥ 6 mm at 6 months in all treatment groups (P < .0001), favoring the MOX and AMOX+ME groups. Adjunctive MOX diminished subgingival Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans to unnoticeable stages, after the follow-up period. Adverse events were noted only in some patients of the AMOX+ME group.
This pilot clinical trial proposes that using MOX and AMOX+ME as adjuncts to SD improves the clinical and microbiologic parameters in comparison to mechanical therapy alone; however, the MOX protocol did not cause adverse events and decreased subgingival A actinomycetemcomitans to imperceptible levels.
与单纯龈下刮治术(SD)相比,辅助使用抗菌药物可改善侵袭性牙周炎患者的探诊深度和临床附着丧失情况。比较了莫西沙星(MOX)和阿莫西林联合甲硝唑(AMOX+ME)作为广泛性侵袭性牙周炎辅助治疗的微生物学和临床疗效。
这项初步随机对照临床试验纳入了36名患者,他们被分配到三个治疗组之一:SD加全身用MOX(400毫克,每日一次,共7天)、SD加全身用AMOX+ME(各500毫克,每日三次,共7天)或SD加安慰剂。在基线以及治疗后3个月和6个月时记录探诊深度、临床附着丧失、探诊出血和菌斑情况。对龈下菌斑样本进行分析。
与基线值相比,所有治疗均导致探诊深度和临床附着丧失显著降低(所有P<0.0001),治疗后6个月时效果仍然存在,但采用抗生素方案的患者改善最为显著(P<0.0001)。所有治疗组在6个月时牙龈袋≥6毫米的发生率均显著降低(P<0.0001),MOX组和AMOX+ME组更占优势。随访期后,辅助使用MOX使龈下伴放线聚集杆菌减少到难以察觉的阶段。仅在AMOX+ME组的一些患者中记录到不良事件。
这项初步临床试验表明,与单纯机械治疗相比,使用MOX和AMOX+ME作为SD的辅助治疗可改善临床和微生物学参数;然而,MOX方案未引起不良事件,并使龈下伴放线聚集杆菌减少到无法察觉的水平。