• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫西沙星与阿莫西林加甲硝唑作为广泛性侵袭性牙周炎辅助治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验的初步研究

Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin plus metronidazole as adjunctive therapy for generalized aggressive periodontitis: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Ardila Carlos M, Flórez-Flórez Juliana, Castañeda-Parra Luis-David, Guzmán Isabel C, Bedoya-García Jader A

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2020;51(8):612-621. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44715.

DOI:10.3290/j.qi.a44715
PMID:32507863
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Adjunctive antimicrobials improve probing depth and clinical attachment loss compared with subgingival debridement (SD) alone in patients with aggressive periodontitis. The microbiologic and clinical effectiveness of moxifloxacin (MOX) and amoxicillin plus metronidazole (AMOX+ME) as adjunctive therapies for generalized aggressive periodontitis were compared.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This pilot randomized controlled clinical trial included 36 patients who were assigned to one of three therapy groups: SD plus systemic MOX (400 mg QD for 7 days), SD plus systemic AMOX+ME (500 mg TID each for 7 days), or SD plus placebo. Probing depth, clinical attachment loss, bleeding on probing, and plaque were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Subgingival plaque samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

All treatments resulted in significant probing depth and clinical attachment loss reduction compared with the baseline values (P < .0001 for all), with the effects still present at 6 months posttreatment, but the patients taking antibiotic protocols presented the most significant gains (P < .0001). There was a significant reduction in the occurrence of gingival pockets ≥ 6 mm at 6 months in all treatment groups (P < .0001), favoring the MOX and AMOX+ME groups. Adjunctive MOX diminished subgingival Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans to unnoticeable stages, after the follow-up period. Adverse events were noted only in some patients of the AMOX+ME group.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot clinical trial proposes that using MOX and AMOX+ME as adjuncts to SD improves the clinical and microbiologic parameters in comparison to mechanical therapy alone; however, the MOX protocol did not cause adverse events and decreased subgingival A actinomycetemcomitans to imperceptible levels.

摘要

目的

与单纯龈下刮治术(SD)相比,辅助使用抗菌药物可改善侵袭性牙周炎患者的探诊深度和临床附着丧失情况。比较了莫西沙星(MOX)和阿莫西林联合甲硝唑(AMOX+ME)作为广泛性侵袭性牙周炎辅助治疗的微生物学和临床疗效。

方法和材料

这项初步随机对照临床试验纳入了36名患者,他们被分配到三个治疗组之一:SD加全身用MOX(400毫克,每日一次,共7天)、SD加全身用AMOX+ME(各500毫克,每日三次,共7天)或SD加安慰剂。在基线以及治疗后3个月和6个月时记录探诊深度、临床附着丧失、探诊出血和菌斑情况。对龈下菌斑样本进行分析。

结果

与基线值相比,所有治疗均导致探诊深度和临床附着丧失显著降低(所有P<0.0001),治疗后6个月时效果仍然存在,但采用抗生素方案的患者改善最为显著(P<0.0001)。所有治疗组在6个月时牙龈袋≥6毫米的发生率均显著降低(P<0.0001),MOX组和AMOX+ME组更占优势。随访期后,辅助使用MOX使龈下伴放线聚集杆菌减少到难以察觉的阶段。仅在AMOX+ME组的一些患者中记录到不良事件。

结论

这项初步临床试验表明,与单纯机械治疗相比,使用MOX和AMOX+ME作为SD的辅助治疗可改善临床和微生物学参数;然而,MOX方案未引起不良事件,并使龈下伴放线聚集杆菌减少到无法察觉的水平。

相似文献

1
Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin plus metronidazole as adjunctive therapy for generalized aggressive periodontitis: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.莫西沙星与阿莫西林加甲硝唑作为广泛性侵袭性牙周炎辅助治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验的初步研究
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(8):612-621. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44715.
2
Effects on clinical outcomes of adjunctive moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin plus metronidazole in periodontitis patients harboring Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythia: exploratory analyses from a clinical trial.携带伴放线放线杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和福赛坦纳菌的牙周炎患者中莫西沙星辅助治疗与阿莫西林+甲硝唑治疗对临床结局的影响:一项临床试验的探索性分析。
Quintessence Int. 2021;52(1):20-29. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44927.
3
Adjunctive moxifloxacin in the treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis patients: clinical and microbiological results of a randomized, triple-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial.莫西沙星辅助治疗广泛性侵袭性牙周炎患者的疗效:一项随机、三盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的临床和微生物学结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Feb;42(2):160-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12345. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
4
Clinical and microbiological effects of different antimicrobials on generalized aggressive periodontitis.不同抗菌药物对广泛侵袭性牙周炎的临床及微生物学影响
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Apr;33(4):254-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00905.x.
5
The combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole improves clinical and microbiologic results of one-stage, full-mouth, ultrasonic debridement in aggressive periodontitis treatment.阿莫西林和甲硝唑联合应用可改善侵袭性牙周炎治疗中全口超声洁治的一期治疗的临床和微生物学效果。
J Periodontol. 2012 Aug;83(8):988-98. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110513. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
6
Impact of baseline microbiological status on clinical outcomes in generalized aggressive periodontitis patients treated with or without adjunctive amoxicillin and metronidazole: an exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled clinical trial.基线微生物学状态对接受或未接受阿莫西林和甲硝唑辅助治疗的广泛侵袭性牙周炎患者临床结局的影响:一项随机对照临床试验的探索性分析
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Nov;41(11):1080-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12299. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
7
Amoxicillin plus metronidazole in the treatment of adult periodontitis patients. A double-blind placebo-controlled study.阿莫西林联合甲硝唑治疗成人牙周炎患者。一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Apr;28(4):296-305. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028004296.x.
8
Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement associated with amoxicillin and metronidazole in the treatment of severe chronic periodontitis.全口超声清创联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑治疗重度慢性牙周炎
J Periodontol. 2009 Aug;80(8):1254-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080403.
9
The use of metronidazole and amoxicillin in the treatment of advanced periodontal disease. A prospective, controlled clinical trial.甲硝唑和阿莫西林在晚期牙周病治疗中的应用。一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):354-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02455.x.
10
A multilevel analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing adjunctive moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/metronidazole for the treatment of aggressive periodontitis.一项随机临床试验的多水平分析,比较辅助使用莫西沙星与阿莫西林/甲硝唑治疗侵袭性牙周炎的效果。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Jun 22;18:44. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of adjunctive periodontal interventions in non-surgical periodontal therapy for Stage III/IV Grade C periodontitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.辅助牙周干预在Ⅲ/Ⅳ期C级牙周炎非手术牙周治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2025 Dec;61:167-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2025.07.001. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Systemic Antibiotics as an Adjunct to Subgingival Debridement: A Network Meta-Analysis.全身用抗生素作为龈下刮治的辅助治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;11(12):1716. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121716.
3
Clinical and Microbiological Efficacy of Adjunctive Systemic Quinolones to Mechanical Therapy in Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
全身应用喹诺酮类药物辅助机械治疗牙周炎的临床及微生物学疗效:文献系统评价
Int J Dent. 2022 May 21;2022:4334269. doi: 10.1155/2022/4334269. eCollection 2022.
4
The Oral Microbiota: Community Composition, Influencing Factors, Pathogenesis, and Interventions.口腔微生物群:群落组成、影响因素、发病机制及干预措施
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 29;13:895537. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.895537. eCollection 2022.
5
Antibiotics in the Treatment of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.抗生素治疗牙周炎:文献系统综述
Int J Dent. 2021 Nov 8;2021:6846074. doi: 10.1155/2021/6846074. eCollection 2021.