School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 8;36(6):89. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02865-8.
Chaotropicity has long been recognised as a property of some compounds. Chaotropes tend to disrupt non-covalent interactions in biological macromolecules (e.g. proteins and nucleic acids) and supramolecular assemblies (e.g. phospholipid membranes). This results in the destabilisation and unfolding of these macromolecules and assemblies. Unsurprisingly, these compounds are typically harmful to living cells since they act against multiple targets, comprising cellular integrity and function. Kosmotropes are the opposite of chaotropes and these compounds promote the ordering and rigidification of biological macromolecules and assemblies. Since many biological macromolecules have optimum levels of flexibility, kosmotropes can also inhibit their activity and can be harmful to cells. Some products of industrial fermentations, most notably alcohols, are chaotropic. This property can be a limiting factor on rates of production and yields. It has been hypothesised that the addition of kosmotropes may mitigate the chaotropicity of some fermentation products. Some microbes naturally adapt to chaotropic environments by producing kosmotropic compatible solutes. Exploitation of this in industrial fermentations has been hampered by scientific and economic issues. The cost of the kosmotropes and their removal during purification needs to be considered. We lack a complete understanding of the chemistry of chaotropicity and a robust, quantitative framework for estimating overall chaotropicities of mixtures. This makes it difficult to predict the amount of kosmotrope required to neutralise the chaotropicity. This review considers examples of industrial fermentations where chaotropicity is an issue and suggests possible mitigations.
离液性长期以来一直被认为是某些化合物的特性。离液剂倾向于破坏生物大分子(如蛋白质和核酸)和超分子组装体(如磷脂膜)中的非共价相互作用。这导致这些大分子和组装体的失稳和展开。毫不奇怪,这些化合物通常对活细胞有害,因为它们针对多个靶标,包括细胞完整性和功能。反离液剂与离液剂相反,这些化合物促进生物大分子和组装体的有序化和刚性化。由于许多生物大分子具有最佳的灵活性水平,反离液剂也可以抑制它们的活性,并且对细胞可能有害。一些工业发酵的产物,特别是醇,是离液剂。这种特性可能是生产速率和产量的限制因素。有人假设,添加反离液剂可能会减轻一些发酵产物的离液性。一些微生物通过产生反离液剂相容的溶质自然适应离液环境。然而,在工业发酵中利用这一点受到了科学和经济问题的阻碍。需要考虑反离液剂的成本及其在纯化过程中的去除。我们对离液性的化学性质缺乏全面的了解,也没有用于估计混合物总体离液性的稳健、定量框架。这使得难以预测中和离液性所需的反离液剂的量。本文综述了工业发酵中离液性是一个问题的例子,并提出了可能的缓解方法。