Byrne Adam, Kokmotou Katerina, Roberts Hannah, Soto Vicente, Tyson-Carr John, Hewitt Danielle, Giesbrecht Timo, Stancak Andrej
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Sep;238(9):1839-1859. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05825-8. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
We explored how reward and value of effort shapes performance in a sustained vigilance, reaction time (RT) task. It was posited that reward and value would hasten RTs and increase cognitive effort by boosting activation in the sensorimotor cortex and inhibition in the frontal cortex, similar to the horse-race model of motor actions. Participants performed a series of speeded responses while expecting differing monetary rewards (0 pence (p), 1 p, and 10 p) if they responded faster than their median RT. Amplitudes of cortical alpha, beta, and theta oscillations were analysed using the event-related desynchronization method. In experiment 1 (N = 29, with 12 females), reward was consistent within block, while in experiment 2 (N = 17, with 12 females), reward amount was displayed before each trial. Each experiment evaluated the baseline amplitude of cortical oscillations differently. The value of effort was evaluated using a cognitive effort discounting task (COGED). In both experiments, RTs decreased significantly with higher rewards. Reward level sharpened the increased amplitudes of beta oscillations during fast responses in experiment 1. In experiment 2, reward decreased the amplitudes of beta oscillations in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex. Individual effort values did not significantly correlate with oscillatory changes in either experiment. Results suggest that reward level and response speed interacted with the task- and baseline-dependent patterns of cortical inhibition in the frontal cortex and with activation in the sensorimotor cortex during the period of motor preparation in a sustained vigilance task. However, neither the shortening of RT with increasing reward nor the value of effort correlated with oscillatory changes. This implies that amplitudes of cortical oscillations may shape upcoming motor responses but do not translate higher-order motivational factors into motor performance.
我们探究了奖励和努力的价值如何在持续警觉反应时间(RT)任务中影响表现。研究假设,奖励和价值会加快反应时间,并通过增强感觉运动皮层的激活和额叶皮层的抑制来增加认知努力,这类似于运动动作的赛马模型。参与者进行了一系列快速反应,同时预期如果他们的反应速度快于自己的平均反应时间,将获得不同的金钱奖励(0便士(p)、1便士和10便士)。使用事件相关去同步化方法分析了皮层α、β和θ振荡的幅度。在实验1(N = 29,其中12名女性)中,奖励在每个组块内保持一致,而在实验2(N = 17,其中12名女性)中,每次试验前都会显示奖励金额。每个实验评估皮层振荡基线幅度的方式不同。使用认知努力折扣任务(COGED)评估努力的价值。在两个实验中,反应时间都随着奖励的提高而显著缩短。在实验1中,奖励水平加剧了快速反应期间β振荡幅度的增加。在实验2中,奖励降低了同侧感觉运动皮层中β振荡的幅度。在两个实验中,个体努力值与振荡变化均无显著相关性。结果表明,在持续警觉任务的运动准备阶段,奖励水平和反应速度与额叶皮层中任务和基线依赖的皮层抑制模式以及感觉运动皮层的激活相互作用。然而,反应时间随奖励增加而缩短以及努力的价值均与振荡变化无关。这意味着皮层振荡的幅度可能会影响即将到来的运动反应,但不会将更高层次的动机因素转化为运动表现。