Suppr超能文献

基于应用程序的康复补充锻炼、依从性及其对结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。

App-based supplemental exercise in rehabilitation, adherence, and effect on outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Royal Rehab, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2020 Aug;34(8):1083-1093. doi: 10.1177/0269215520928119. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

QUESTION

To determine the uptake of an app-based supplemental exercise programme in a rehabilitation setting and the effect of such a programme on length of stay and function compared to usual care physiotherapy.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with random allocation and assessor blinding.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 144 individuals with mixed diagnoses (orthopaedic, neurological, reconditioning) admitted for inpatient sub-acute rehabilitation.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly allocated to usual care physiotherapy (control group) or usual care physiotherapy with the addition of an app-based supplemental exercise programme (intervention group).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary measure of interest was total supplementary exercise dosage completed by the intervention group. The primary between-group outcome measure was length of stay with secondary measures including walking endurance (Six-Minute Walk Test), walking speed (10-Metre Walk Test), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and level of disability (Functional Independence Measure).

RESULTS

Participants in the intervention group performed 7 minutes (SD: 9) or 49 repetitions (SD: 48) of supplementary exercise using the app each day. There were no differences between the groups for length of stay (mean difference (MD): -0.5 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.2 to 2.2) or change in any secondary functional outcome measures, including walking speed (MD: -0.1 m/s, 95% CI: -0.2 to 0.0) and disability (MD: -0.9, 95% CI: -3.6 to 1.8).

CONCLUSION

A small supplementary exercise dose was achieved by participants in the intervention group. However, such a programme did not affect length of stay or functional outcomes when compared to usual care.

摘要

问题

在康复环境中,确定基于应用程序的补充运动方案的采用情况,以及与常规物理治疗相比,该方案对住院时间和功能的影响。

设计

随机对照试验,随机分组,评估者设盲。

参与者

共 144 名患有混合诊断(骨科、神经科、康复)的患者,接受住院亚急性康复治疗。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配到常规物理治疗(对照组)或常规物理治疗加基于应用程序的补充运动方案(干预组)。

主要结果

干预组完成的总补充运动剂量是主要的研究指标。主要的组间结局指标是住院时间,次要指标包括步行耐力(6 分钟步行测试)、步行速度(10 米步行测试)、功能移动性(计时起立行走测试)和残疾程度(功能独立性测量)。

结果

干预组的参与者每天使用该应用程序进行 7 分钟(SD:9)或 49 次(SD:48)补充运动。两组在住院时间(平均差异(MD):-0.5 天,95%置信区间(CI):-3.2 至 2.2)或任何次要功能结局指标的变化方面均无差异,包括步行速度(MD:-0.1 米/秒,95% CI:-0.2 至 0.0)和残疾程度(MD:-0.9,95% CI:-3.6 至 1.8)。

结论

干预组的参与者实现了一个较小的补充运动剂量。然而,与常规护理相比,这样的方案并没有影响住院时间或功能结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验