Department of Respiration, First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University), 314000 Jiaxing, China.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University), 314000 Jiaxing, China.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 May 16;2020:6896517. doi: 10.1155/2020/6896517. eCollection 2020.
To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from needle stick injuries.
A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion needle were included and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Disposable infusion needles with a separation-free safety tube were used in the intervention group, whereas conventional ones were used in the control group. Then, effects of the two types of infusion sets were observed and compared.
As for the operation time for infusion, it was (82.19 ± 1.80) seconds in the intervention group and (83.02 ± 1.83) seconds in the control group, with the difference statistically significant ( < 0.05). Besides, the exposure time of the needles after infusion in the intervention group was (3.36 ± 0.17) seconds while (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds in the control group; the difference between which was statistically significant ( < 0.05). In terms of the time for needle disposal, (18.60 ± 0.84) seconds was required in the intervention group, while for the control group, it took (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds, and the difference between two groups was of statistical significance as well ( < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the accidental slip rate of the needles as that turned out 0% in both groups ( > 0.05). It was worth noting that the block rate of the disposed needles in the intervention group was 100%.
The separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle could instantly block the sharp needle after infusion, which reduces the needle exposure time and lowers the risk of needle stick injuries. In the meantime, the safety tube is convenient to use, and its application can shorten the time for infusion and needle disposal, consequently improving the working efficiency of nurses. As the new type safety tube has above advantages and would not raise the risk of needle slippage, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
研制一种新型输液器并将其应用于临床，探讨其在预防针刺伤中的效果。
选择需使用一次性输液针进行静脉输液的 200 例住院患者，随机分为干预组和对照组，干预组采用带分离式安全管的一次性输液针，对照组采用常规一次性输液针。观察比较两种输液器的效果。
干预组输液操作时间为（82.19±1.80）s，对照组为（83.02±1.83）s，差异有统计学意义（ < 0.05）；干预组输液后针尖暴露时间为（3.36±0.17）s，对照组为（18.85±1.18）s，差异有统计学意义（ < 0.05）；干预组处理针头时间为（18.60±0.84）s，对照组为（18.85±1.18）s，差异有统计学意义（ < 0.05）；两组意外滑针率均为 0%，差异无统计学意义（ > 0.05）；干预组处理后废弃针头的堵塞率为 100%。
一次性输液针带分离式安全管可在输液后瞬间将锐器封闭，减少针尖暴露时间，降低针刺伤风险；安全管使用方便，可缩短输液和处理针头时间，提高护士工作效率；新型安全管具有上述优点，不会增加滑针风险，值得临床推广。
