Bergsma Minke, Doornberg Job N, Hendrickx Laurent, Hayat Batur, Kerkhoffs Gino M M J, Jhadav Bhavin, Jaarsma Ruurd L, Bain Gregory I
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Flinders Medical Centre/Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery and the Biomechanics and Implants Research Group, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):268-274. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694719. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of all interpretations of the definition of the watershed line used in literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this review. A comprehensive search was performed for definitions of the watershed line given in literature. A total of 32 studies giving an explicit interpretation of the definition of the watershed line or anatomical reference for plate positioning in writing and/or imaging were included. In 32 studies, we found eight different landmarks used to refer to the watershed line or correct plate positioning. Five studies used two different soft tissue landmarks. Six different bony landmarks were described in 24 studies. These could further be subdivided into three anatomical interpretations, described in seven studies, in which the term "watershed line" is explained as a distinguishable anatomical line, and two surgical interpretations, described in 15 studies, which are purely reflecting the optimal location of the volar plate. One interpretation of the watershed line described in two studies combined both anatomical and surgical landmarks. The (mis)interpretation of the definition of the term "watershed line" as described by Orbay is subject to the type of landmarks and purpose used: soft tissue or bony landmarks and an anatomical or a surgical purpose. A clear distinction can be made between interpretations using bony landmarks, as the true watershed line is defined and definitions using soft tissue landmarks, which might represent the reference points surgeons use in clinical practice.
本系统评价的目的是概述文献中使用的分水岭线定义的所有解释。 本评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。对文献中给出的分水岭线定义进行了全面检索。总共纳入了32项研究,这些研究以书面和/或影像学形式对分水岭线定义或钢板定位的解剖学参考进行了明确解释。 在32项研究中,我们发现了八个不同的标志用于指代分水岭线或正确的钢板定位。五项研究使用了两种不同的软组织标志。24项研究中描述了六种不同的骨性标志。这些可以进一步细分为三种解剖学解释(七项研究中描述,其中“分水岭线”一词被解释为一条可区分的解剖学线)和两种手术解释(15项研究中描述,纯粹反映掌侧板的最佳位置)。两项研究中描述的一种分水岭线解释结合了解剖学和手术标志。 如Orbay所描述的,“分水岭线”一词定义的(错误)解释取决于所使用的标志类型和目的:软组织或骨性标志以及解剖学或手术目的。使用骨性标志的解释(因为定义了真正的分水岭线)与使用软组织标志的解释(可能代表外科医生在临床实践中使用的参考点)之间可以做出明确区分。