University College Dublin Centre for Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Apr 4;34(4):449-467. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2019-0353.
Achieving integrated care is a key focus for health systems and has resulted in various structures between and within organisations. The reorganisation of the Irish health system into hospital networks/groups aims to encourage work across hospitals to integrate care. This study evaluated if collective leadership emerged over time through increased interaction and collaboration following the organisation of hospitals into a network. A secondary aim was to elucidate the potential for collective leadership, through understanding the barriers and enablers perceived by participants.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study employed social network analysis and qualitative interviews. Leaders across the hospital group were invited to participate in an online network survey and interviews (analysed using thematic analysis) at three time points over an 18-month period.
Although there was evidence that some parts of network were beginning to operate collectively, the structures observed were more typical of a hierarchical network. Disruption in the network and uncertainty regarding permanence of the organisational structure had a negative impact on the potential for collective leadership. Yet, progress was evident in terms of establishing building blocks for collective leadership and integration, including developing trust, mutual understanding and creating space for change.
This study contributes to the literature by reflecting on the mechanisms and initiatives perceived as enabling/inhibiting collective leadership. Based on this research, it is important to communicate a clear and consistent message about the plans for the organisations involved and be clear regarding the roles and expectations for those involved in introducing new approaches to leadership and integration. Honest collaboration, openness and certainty in communication will likely be important in order to help create the contextual conditions to enable collective and system approaches to introduce "stepping stones" to change. These conditions include developing interpersonal relationships between leaders, creating time and space for deep and shared reflection, and enhancing trust among colleagues.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: A key strength of this study is the linking of leadership-as-networks theory with social network methods to investigate collective leadership in practice. This study contributes to the literature by reflecting on the mechanisms and initiatives perceived as enabling/inhibiting collective leadership.
实现整合护理是卫生系统的一个关键重点,这导致了组织之间和组织内部的各种结构。将爱尔兰卫生系统重组为医院网络/团体,旨在鼓励医院之间开展工作以整合护理。本研究通过评估在将医院组织成网络后,随着互动和协作的增加,是否出现了集体领导。次要目的是通过了解参与者认为的障碍和促成因素,阐明集体领导的潜力。
设计/方法/方法:本研究采用社会网络分析和定性访谈。邀请医院集团的领导参加在线网络调查,并在 18 个月的三个时间点进行访谈(使用主题分析进行分析)。
尽管有证据表明网络的某些部分开始集体运作,但观察到的结构更典型的是层次网络。网络中断和组织结构永久性的不确定性对集体领导的潜力产生了负面影响。然而,在建立集体领导和整合的基础方面取得了进展,包括建立信任、相互理解和为变革创造空间。
本研究通过反思被认为是促进/抑制集体领导的机制和举措,为文献做出了贡献。基于这项研究,重要的是要就所涉及组织的计划传达一个清晰一致的信息,并明确参与引入新领导和整合方法的人员的角色和期望。诚实的合作、沟通中的开放性和确定性可能对于帮助创造有利于集体和系统方法引入“垫脚石”以实现变革的背景条件非常重要。这些条件包括在领导者之间发展人际关系,为深入和共享的反思创造时间和空间,并增强同事之间的信任。
原创性/价值:这项研究的一个主要优势是将领导作为网络理论与社会网络方法联系起来,以调查实践中的集体领导。本研究通过反思被认为是促进/抑制集体领导的机制和举措,为文献做出了贡献。