Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct;21(10):772-778. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000997.
Identification of silent cardiovascular diseases by preparticipation evaluation (PPE) and disqualification from competitive sports have the potential to prevent sudden death but may induce adverse psychological consequences, particularly for exercise addicted athletes. We investigated the relationship between exercise addiction, attitude towards PPE and reaction to cardiovascular disease diagnosis.
We invited Italian competitive athletes to participate in an online questionnaire investigating exercise addiction, opinion about mandatory PPE and potential reaction to both sports disqualification and hypothetical diagnosis of different cardiovascular diseases.
The survey was completed by 1011 athletes (75% men, median age 30 years) encompassing a wide range of sports disciplines and competition levels. According to the 'Exercise Dependence Scale-21', 6% were classified as exercise addicted. The vast majority of both exercise addicted and nonexercise addicted athletes agreed that PPE should be mandatory (92 and 96%, P = 0.17) and that the eligibility decision should be left to the sports medicine physician (82 and 89%, P = 0.08). In case a cardiovascular disease is identified, a higher proportion of exercise addicted athletes would undergo 'open-heart' surgery if this would allow resuming high-intensity sport (54 versus 31%, P < 0.001) and would continue exercising in case of diagnosis of a disease at risk of sudden death (57 versus 32%, P < 0.001).
Exercise addiction does not interfere with a general positive opinion about PPE, but is likely to impact on the adherence to medical prescription should a cardiovascular diagnosis be made. Exercise addiction should be taken into account when counselling athletes with newly diagnosed heart diseases.
通过参赛前评估(PPE)识别无声心血管疾病并将其排除在竞技体育之外,有可能预防猝死,但可能会带来不良的心理后果,尤其是对运动成瘾的运动员。我们研究了运动成瘾、对 PPE 的态度以及对心血管疾病诊断的反应之间的关系。
我们邀请意大利竞技运动员参与一项在线问卷调查,调查内容包括运动成瘾、对强制性 PPE 的看法以及对运动资格取消和假设的不同心血管疾病诊断的潜在反应。
该调查由 1011 名运动员(75%为男性,中位年龄 30 岁)完成,涵盖了广泛的运动项目和竞技水平。根据“运动依赖量表-21”,有 6%的运动员被归类为运动成瘾。绝大多数运动成瘾和非运动成瘾的运动员都认为 PPE 应该是强制性的(92%和 96%,P=0.17),并且应由运动医学医生来决定参赛资格(82%和 89%,P=0.08)。如果发现心血管疾病,如果心脏手术可以允许恢复高强度运动,那么更多的运动成瘾运动员会选择接受(54%比 31%,P<0.001),并且如果诊断出有猝死风险的疾病,他们会继续运动(57%比 32%,P<0.001)。
运动成瘾并不影响对 PPE 的普遍积极看法,但如果做出心血管诊断,可能会影响对医嘱的遵守。在为新诊断出心脏病的运动员提供咨询时,应考虑运动成瘾。