• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动力学直接肽反应性分析(kDPRA):七家实验室环试中的实验室内和实验室间重现性。

The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial.

机构信息

BASF SE Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

L'Oréal Research & Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France.

出版信息

ALTEX. 2020;37(4):639-651. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004291. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

DOI:10.14573/altex.2004291
PMID:32521036
Abstract

While the skin sensitization hazard of substances can be identified using non-animal methods, the classification of potency into UN GHS sub-categories 1A and 1B remains challenging. The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) is a modification of the DPRA wherein the reaction kinetics of a test substance towards a synthetic cysteine-containing peptide are evaluated. For this purpose, several concentrations of the test substance are incubated with the synthetic peptide for several incubation times. The reaction is stopped by addition of monobromobimane, which forms a fluorescent complex with the free cysteine of the model peptide. The relative remaining non-depleted amount of peptide is determined. Kinetic rate constants are derived from the depletion vs concentration and time matrix and used to distinguish between UN GHS sub-category 1A sensitizers and test substances in sub-category 1B/not classified test substances. In this study, we present a ring trial of the kDPRA with 24 blind-coded test substances in seven laboratories. The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility were 96% and 88%, respectively (both for differentiating GHS Cat 1A sensitizers from GHS Cat 1B/not classified). Following an independent peer review, the kDPRA was considered to be acceptable for the identification of GHS Cat 1A skin sensitizers. Besides GHS Cat 1A identification, the kDPRA can be used as part of a defined approach(es) with a quantitative data integration procedure for skin sensitization potency assessment. For this aim, next to reproducibility of classification, the quantitative reproducibility and variability of the rate constants were quantified in this study.

摘要

虽然可以使用非动物方法来确定物质的皮肤致敏危害,但将效力分类为联合国 GHS 亚类 1A 和 1B 仍然具有挑战性。动力学直接肽反应性测定 (kDPRA) 是 DPRA 的一种改进,其中评估测试物质对合成含半胱氨酸肽的反应动力学。为此,将几种浓度的测试物质与合成肽孵育几个孵育时间。通过加入单溴丁二酰亚胺来停止反应,单溴丁二酰亚胺与模型肽中的游离半胱氨酸形成荧光复合物。测定剩余未耗尽的肽的相对量。从消耗与浓度和时间矩阵中得出动力学速率常数,并用于区分联合国 GHS 亚类 1A 敏化剂和亚类 1B/未分类测试物质。在这项研究中,我们在七个实验室中进行了 kDPRA 的环试验,共有 24 个盲码测试物质。实验室内部和实验室之间的重现性分别为 96%和 88%(均用于区分 GHS Cat 1A 敏化剂和 GHS Cat 1B/未分类)。经过独立的同行评审,kDPRA 被认为可用于识别 GHS Cat 1A 皮肤致敏剂。除了 GHS Cat 1A 识别之外,kDPRA 还可以作为具有定量数据集成程序的皮肤致敏效力评估的定义方法的一部分。为此,除了分类的重现性外,本研究还量化了速率常数的定量重现性和可变性。

相似文献

1
The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial.动力学直接肽反应性分析(kDPRA):七家实验室环试中的实验室内和实验室间重现性。
ALTEX. 2020;37(4):639-651. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004291. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
2
Predictivity of the kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) for sensitizer potency assessment and GHS subclassification.动力学直接肽反应性分析(kDPRA)预测敏化剂效力评估和 GHS 分类。
ALTEX. 2020;37(4):652-664. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004292. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Prediction of skin sensitization potency sub-categories using peptide reactivity data.利用肽反应性数据预测皮肤致敏强度亚类。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2017 Dec;45(Pt 1):134-145. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation - scope and limitations.皮肤致敏肽反应性测定——范围与局限性
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2022 Jul;52(6):420-430. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2022.2111252. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Integrated skin sensitization assessment based on OECD methods (II): Hazard and potency by combining kinetic peptide reactivity and the "2 out of 3" Defined Approach.基于 OECD 方法的综合皮肤致敏评估(二):通过结合动力学肽反应性和“2/3”定义方法评估危害和效力。
ALTEX. 2022;39(4):647-655. doi: 10.14573/altex.2201142. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.根据联合国全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(UN GHS),利用 EpiSkin™ 重建人体表皮皮肤腐蚀性测试方法对皮肤腐蚀性化学品进行亚分类:对 OECD 测试指南 431 的修订。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2014 Mar;28(2):131-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
7
A critical review of the kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) for skin sensitizer potency assessment - taking it forward.关于动力学直接肽反应性测定法(kDPRA)在皮肤致敏剂效力评估中的关键评价——向前推进。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2021 Nov;51(10):805-819. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2021.2020212. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
The usefulness of the validated SkinEthic™ RHE test method to identify skin corrosive UN GHS subcategories.经过验证的SkinEthic™ RHE测试方法在识别皮肤腐蚀性联合国全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)子类别的实用性。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2014 Jun;28(4):616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
The dimer effect: A refinement approach towards skin sensitization assessment in-chemico using Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay.二聚体效应:一种使用氨基酸衍生物反应性测定法在化学层面评估皮肤致敏性的优化方法。
J Appl Toxicol. 2024 Nov;44(11):1804-1815. doi: 10.1002/jat.4681. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
Validation study on the Ocular Irritection assay for eye irritation testing.用于眼刺激试验的眼刺激试验验证研究。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2014 Aug;28(5):1046-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of Preliminary Candidate Surface Guidelines for Air Force-Relevant Dermal Sensitizers Using New Approach Methodologies.使用新方法制定与空军相关的皮肤致敏剂初步候选表面指南。
Toxics. 2025 Aug 2;13(8):660. doi: 10.3390/toxics13080660.
2
Avoiding a reproducibility crisis in regulatory toxicology-on the fundamental role of ring trials.避免监管毒理学中的重现性危机——环试验的基础作用。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Jul;98(7):2047-2063. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03736-z. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
Investigating sensitization activity of azobenzene disperse dyes via the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA).
通过直接多肽反应测定法(DPRA)研究偶氮分散染料的敏化活性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2023 Dec;182:114108. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.114108. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
Amino Chemoassay Profiling of Aromatic Aldehydes-Unraveling Drivers of Their Skin Sensitization Potency.芳香醛的氨基酸化学分析——揭示其皮肤致敏强度的驱动因素。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2023 Jul 17;36(7):1055-1070. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00013. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Development of a 96-Well Electrophilic Allergen Screening Assay for Skin Sensitization Using a Measurement Science Approach.采用测量科学方法开发用于皮肤致敏的96孔亲电过敏原筛选检测方法。
Toxics. 2022 May 17;10(5):257. doi: 10.3390/toxics10050257.
6
Quantitative assessment of sensitizing potency using a dose-response adaptation of GARDskin.使用 GARDskin 的剂量反应适应性对致敏效力进行定量评估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98247-7.
7
Prediction of Skin Sensitization: ?皮肤致敏预测:?
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 4;12:655771. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.655771. eCollection 2021.