• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用新方法制定与空军相关的皮肤致敏剂初步候选表面指南。

Development of Preliminary Candidate Surface Guidelines for Air Force-Relevant Dermal Sensitizers Using New Approach Methodologies.

作者信息

Keebaugh Andrew J, Steele Megan L, Islas-Robles Argel, Phillips Jakeb, Hilberer Allison, Cantrell Kayla, Chushak Yaroslav G, Mattie David R, Clewell Rebecca A, Merrill Elaine A

机构信息

AV, Inc., Dayton, OH 45432, USA.

711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH 45433, USA.

出版信息

Toxics. 2025 Aug 2;13(8):660. doi: 10.3390/toxics13080660.

DOI:10.3390/toxics13080660
PMID:40863936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12390015/
Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an immunologic reaction to a dermal chemical exposure that, once triggered in an individual, will result in an allergic response following subsequent encounters with the allergen. Air Force epidemiological consultations have indicated that aircraft structural maintenance workers may experience ACD at elevated rates compared to other occupations. We aimed to better understand the utility of non-animal testing methods in characterizing the sensitization potential of chemicals used during Air Force operations by evaluating the skin sensitization hazard of Air Force-relevant chemicals using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in a case study. We also evaluated the use of NAM data to develop preliminary candidate surface guidelines (PCSGs, maximum concentrations of chemicals on workplace surfaces to prevent induction of dermal sensitization) for chemicals identified as sensitizers. NAMs for assessing skin sensitization, including in silico models and experimental assays, were leveraged into an integrated approach to predict sensitization hazard for 19 chemicals. Local lymph node assay effective concentration values were predicted from NAM assay data via previously published quantitative models. The derived values were used to calculate PCSGs, which can be used to compare the presence of these chemicals on work surfaces to better understand the risk of Airmen developing ACD from occupational exposures.

摘要

过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)是一种对皮肤化学暴露的免疫反应,一旦在个体中触发,随后再次接触过敏原时就会引发过敏反应。美国空军的流行病学咨询表明,与其他职业相比,飞机结构维修工人患ACD的比例可能更高。我们旨在通过在一个案例研究中使用新方法(NAMs)评估与空军相关化学品的皮肤致敏危害,更好地了解非动物测试方法在表征空军行动中使用的化学品致敏潜力方面的效用。我们还评估了使用NAM数据为被确定为致敏剂的化学品制定初步候选表面指南(PCSGs,工作场所表面化学品的最大浓度,以防止引起皮肤致敏)。用于评估皮肤致敏的NAMs,包括计算机模拟模型和实验分析,被整合为一种综合方法,以预测19种化学品的致敏危害。通过先前发表的定量模型,从NAM分析数据中预测局部淋巴结试验有效浓度值。导出的值用于计算PCSGs,可用于比较工作表面上这些化学品的存在情况,以更好地了解飞行员因职业暴露而患ACD的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a8/12390015/fe788cd79bab/toxics-13-00660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a8/12390015/fe788cd79bab/toxics-13-00660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a8/12390015/fe788cd79bab/toxics-13-00660-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Preliminary Candidate Surface Guidelines for Air Force-Relevant Dermal Sensitizers Using New Approach Methodologies.使用新方法制定与空军相关的皮肤致敏剂初步候选表面指南。
Toxics. 2025 Aug 2;13(8):660. doi: 10.3390/toxics13080660.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis.预防职业性刺激性手部皮炎的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD004414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub3.
4
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Deriving a point of departure for assessing the skin sensitization risk of wearable device constituents with in vitro methods.采用体外方法评估可穿戴设备成分的皮肤致敏风险的起始点。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2024 Jul;189:114725. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114725. Epub 2024 May 12.
2
A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies.建立新方法学科学置信度的框架。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Nov;96(11):2865-2879. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
3
Acceptable surface limits (ASLs) of skin sensitizers derived from the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values and their relationships to known sensitization potency information.
可接受的皮肤致敏物表面限值(ASLs)源自局部淋巴结试验(LLNA):BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 值及其与已知致敏强度信息的关系。
J Appl Toxicol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1723-1730. doi: 10.1002/jat.4339. Epub 2022 May 22.
4
Integrated skin sensitization assessment based on OECD methods (I): Deriving a point of departure for risk assessment.基于 OECD 方法的综合皮肤致敏评估(一):得出风险评估的起点。
ALTEX. 2022;39(4):636-646. doi: 10.14573/altex.2201141. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Integrated skin sensitization assessment based on OECD methods (II): Hazard and potency by combining kinetic peptide reactivity and the "2 out of 3" Defined Approach.基于 OECD 方法的综合皮肤致敏评估(二):通过结合动力学肽反应性和“2/3”定义方法评估危害和效力。
ALTEX. 2022;39(4):647-655. doi: 10.14573/altex.2201142. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients.基于证据权重法的香料致敏原强度分类。
Dermatitis. 2022;33(2):161-175. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000854.
7
Amino Reactivity of Glutardialdehyde and Monoaldehydes─Chemoassay Profile vs Skin Sensitization Potency.戊二醛与单醛的氨基反应性─化学分析特性与皮肤致敏强度的关系。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2021 Nov 15;34(11):2353-2365. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00266. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials.更新香料物质皮肤致敏定量风险评估中的暴露评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104805. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104805. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial.动力学直接肽反应性分析(kDPRA):七家实验室环试中的实验室内和实验室间重现性。
ALTEX. 2020;37(4):639-651. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004291. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Evaluation of the global performance of eight in silico skin sensitization models using human data.利用人体数据评估八种计算机皮肤致敏模型的全球性能。
ALTEX. 2021;38(1):33-48. doi: 10.14573/altex.1911261. Epub 2020 May 7.