Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1497-1505. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951.
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute diagnostic setting, serological tests are urgently needed. Unlike PCR tests which are highly specific, cross-reactivity is a major challenge for COVID-19 antibody tests considering there are six other coronaviruses known to infect humans. SARS-CoV is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2 sharing approximately 80% sequence identity and both belong to the species in the genus of family . We developed and compared the performance of four different serological tests to comprehensively assess the cross-reactivity between COVID-19 and SARS patient sera. There is significant cross-reactivity when N protein of either virus is used. The S1 or RBD regions from the spike (S) protein offers better specificity. Amongst the different platforms, capture ELISA performed best. We found that SARS survivors all have significant levels of antibodies remaining in their blood 17 years after infection. Anti-N antibodies waned more than anti-RBD antibodies, and the latter is known to play a more important role in providing protective immunity.
针对由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)引起的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情,需要多种诊断检测方法来进行急性疾病诊断、接触者追踪、监测无症状感染率和评估群体免疫。虽然聚合酶链反应(PCR)仍然是急性诊断环境中的首选检测方法,但急需血清学检测方法。与高度特异性的 PCR 检测不同,由于已知有 6 种其他冠状病毒会感染人类,因此交叉反应性是 COVID-19 抗体检测的一个主要挑战。SARS-CoV 与 SARS-CoV-2 在基因上具有相关性,其序列同一性约为 80%,两者均属于β冠状病毒属中的一个种。我们开发并比较了四种不同的血清学检测方法的性能,以全面评估 COVID-19 与 SARS 患者血清之间的交叉反应性。当使用任一病毒的 N 蛋白时,都会发生明显的交叉反应。来自刺突(S)蛋白的 S1 或受体结合域(RBD)区域提供了更好的特异性。在不同的平台中,捕获 ELISA 的性能最佳。我们发现,SARS 幸存者在感染 17 年后,其血液中仍存在大量抗体。抗 N 抗体的衰减速度高于抗 RBD 抗体,而后者在提供保护性免疫方面起着更重要的作用。