Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Bioethics Chair, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya, Vic, Spain.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2791-2808. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00229-x. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
Two hundred years after it was first published, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus remains relevant. This novel has endured because of its literary merits and because its themes lend themselves to analysis from multiple viewpoints. Scholars from many disciplines have examined this work in relation to controversial scientific research. In this paper, we review the academic literature where Frankenstein is used to discuss ethics, bioethics, science, technology and medicine. We searched the academic literature and carried out a content analysis of articles discussing the novel and films derived from it, analyzing the findings qualitatively and quantitatively. We recorded the following variables: year and language of publication, whether it referred to the novel or to a film, the academic discipline in which it was published, and the topics addressed in the analysis. Our findings indicate that the scientific literature on Frankenstein focuses mainly on science and the personality of the scientist rather than on the creature the scientist created or ethical aspects of his research. The scientist's responsibility is central to the ethical interest of Frankenstein; this issue entails both the motivation underlying the scientist's acts and the consequences of these acts.
两百年来,玛丽·雪莱的《科学怪人》或现代普罗米修斯依然具有现实意义。这部小说之所以经久不衰,不仅是因为它的文学价值,还因为它的主题可以从多个角度进行分析。许多学科的学者都从与有争议的科学研究的关系方面对这部作品进行了研究。在本文中,我们回顾了将《科学怪人》用于讨论伦理、生命伦理、科学、技术和医学的学术文献。我们搜索了学术文献,并对讨论这部小说和改编自它的电影的文章进行了内容分析,对研究结果进行了定性和定量分析。我们记录了以下变量:出版年份和语言、是否指的是小说或电影、发表文章的学科以及分析中涉及的主题。我们的研究结果表明,关于《科学怪人》的科学文献主要集中在科学和科学家的个性上,而不是集中在科学家创造的生物或他的研究的伦理方面。科学家的责任是《科学怪人》的伦理兴趣的核心,这个问题涉及到科学家行为的动机和这些行为的后果。