Caglic Iztok, Sushentsev Nikita, Shah Nimish, Warren Anne Y, Lamb Benjamin W, Barrett Tristan
CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Aug;141:109804. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109804. Epub 2021 May 27.
To compare biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) staging accuracy in assessing extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI).
Biopsy-naïve patients undergoing 3 T-MRI before radical prostatectomy for clinically significant prostate cancer were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Two uroradiologists separately evaluated bpMRI and mpMRI for presence of ECE and SVI using a 5-point Likert scale (1: ECE/SVI highly unlikely, 5: ECE/SVI highly likely).
110 men of median age 63 years and PSA 8.5 ng/mL were included. ECE and SVI was confirmed histologically in 71/110 (64.5 %) and 18/110 (16.4 %) patients, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI versus mpMRI for predicting ECE was 59.1 % and 87.2 % versus 66.2 % and 84.6 %, respectively. For SVI detection, the sensitivity and specificity for bpMRI versus mpMRI was 66.7 % and 92.4 % versus 83.3 % and 97.8 %, respectively. At an optimal cut-off Likert score ≥3 for ECE prediction, mpMRI area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.87) versus 0.78 (95 % CI 0.69-0.86) for bpMRI (p = 0.52) and for SVI, mpMRI AUC was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.84-0.96) versus 0.86 (95 % CI 0.78-0.92) for bpMRI (p = 0.02), respectively. Inter-reader agreement for both ECE and SVI prediction was substantial, with a marginally higher k-value for mpMRI (k range, 0.67-0.75) than bpMRI (k range, 0.65-0.69).
Diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI was comparable for detection of ECE, however, mpMRI with contrast was superior for SVI detection and improved the inter-reader agreement.
比较双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在评估前列腺癌包膜外侵犯(ECE)和精囊侵犯(SVI)方面的分期准确性。
本单中心回顾性研究纳入了因临床显著前列腺癌行根治性前列腺切除术前行3T-MRI检查且未行活检的患者。两名泌尿放射科医生分别使用5分李克特量表(1:ECE/SVI极不可能,5:ECE/SVI极有可能)评估bpMRI和mpMRI是否存在ECE和SVI。
纳入110名中位年龄63岁、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为8.5 ng/mL的男性。分别有71/110(64.5%)和18/110(16.4%)的患者经组织学证实存在ECE和SVI。bpMRI与mpMRI预测ECE的敏感性和特异性分别为59.1%和87.2%,以及66.2%和84.6%。对于SVI检测,bpMRI与mpMRI的敏感性和特异性分别为66.7%和92.4%,以及83.3%和97.8%。在预测ECE的最佳截断李克特评分≥3时,mpMRI的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.80(95%置信区间(CI)0.72 - 0.87),bpMRI为0.78(95%CI 0.69 - 0.86)(p = 0.52);对于SVI,mpMRI的AUC为0.91(95%CI 0.84 - 0.96),bpMRI为0.86(95%CI 0.78 - 0.92)(p = 0.02)。两位阅片者对ECE和SVI预测的一致性均较高,mpMRI的kappa值(k范围0.67 - 0.75)略高于bpMRI(k范围0.65 - 0.69)。
bpMRI和mpMRI在检测ECE方面的诊断性能相当,然而,增强mpMRI在检测SVI方面更具优势,且提高了阅片者间的一致性。