Tiwari Divya, O'Donnell Alyson, Renaut Richard, Richardson Tristan, Allen Stephen
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK and Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
Future Healthc J. 2020 Jun;7(2):143-148. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0022.
Hospital mortality rates have frequently been improved by identifying diagnostic groups with high mortality and targeting interventions to those specific groups. We found that high residual inpatient mortality persisted after targeted measures had achieved an initial reduction, and that the causes were spread across a wide range of diagnostic groups. Further interventions were put in place consisting of a structured electronic mortality form and systematised mortality scrutiny and reporting (primary intervention) accompanied by a number of quality improvement interventions arising from the mortality analysis (secondary interventions). We found that those interventions were associated with progressive improvements in mortality rates and average lengths of inpatient stay over the 5-year study period. Winter quarter mortality improvements reached a high level of statistical significance but could not be attributed to changes in any particular diagnostic groups. We conclude that progress with mortality improvements is probably best achieved by applying both code-targeted and general interventions simultaneously.
通过识别高死亡率的诊断组并针对这些特定组进行干预,医院死亡率常常得到改善。我们发现,在针对性措施实现初步降低之后,仍存在较高的住院残余死亡率,且原因分布在广泛的诊断组中。进一步实施了干预措施,包括结构化的电子死亡表单以及系统化的死亡审查和报告(主要干预措施),同时还进行了一些由死亡率分析产生的质量改进干预措施(次要干预措施)。我们发现,在为期5年的研究期间,这些干预措施与死亡率和平均住院时长的逐步改善相关。冬季季度死亡率的改善达到了高度的统计学显著性,但无法归因于任何特定诊断组的变化。我们得出结论,同时应用针对编码的干预措施和一般干预措施可能最有助于实现死亡率改善方面的进展。