Karbstein Kevin, Prinz Kathleen, Hellwig Frank, Römermann Christine
Institute of Ecology and Systematics Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena Jena Germany.
Present address: Department of Systematics, Biodiversity and Evolution of Plants (with Herbarium) University of Goettingen Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant Sciences Goettingen Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 16;10(11):5015-5033. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6255. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Intraspecific trait variation (ITV), based on available genetic diversity, is one of the major means plant populations can respond to environmental variability. The study of functional trait variation and diversity has become popular in ecological research, for example, as a proxy for plant performance influencing fitness. Up to now, it is unclear which aspects of intraspecific functional trait variation (iFD) can be attributed to the environment or genetics under natural conditions. Here, we examined 260 individuals from 13 locations of the rare (semi-)dry calcareous grassland species L. in terms of iFD, within-habitat heterogeneity, and genetic diversity. The iFD was assessed by measuring functional traits (releasing height, biomass, leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, F/F, performance index, stomatal pore surface, and stomatal pore area index). Abiotic within-habitat heterogeneity was derived from altitude, slope exposure, slope, leaf area index, soil depth, and further soil factors. Based on microsatellites, we calculated expected heterozygosity (H) because it best-explained, among other indices, iFD. We performed multiple linear regression models quantifying relationships among iFD, abiotic within-habitat heterogeneity and genetic diversity, and also between separate functional traits and abiotic within-habitat heterogeneity or genetic diversity. We found that abiotic within-habitat heterogeneity influenced iFD twice as strong compared to genetic diversity. Both aspects together explained 77% of variation in iFD ( = .77, = 21.66, < .001). The majority of functional traits (releasing height, biomass, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, F/F, and performance index) were related to abiotic habitat conditions indicating responses to environmental heterogeneity. In contrast, only morphology-related functional traits (releasing height, biomass, and leaf area) were related to genetics. Our results suggest that both within-habitat heterogeneity and genetic diversity affect iFD and are thus crucial to consider when aiming to understand or predict changes of plant species performance under changing environmental conditions.
基于现有遗传多样性的种内性状变异(ITV)是植物种群应对环境变异的主要方式之一。功能性状变异和多样性的研究在生态学研究中已变得很普遍,例如,作为影响适合度的植物表现的一个指标。到目前为止,尚不清楚在自然条件下种内功能性状变异(iFD)的哪些方面可归因于环境或遗传。在此,我们从iFD、生境内异质性和遗传多样性方面,对来自13个地点的260株珍稀(半)干旱钙质草原物种L.进行了研究。通过测量功能性状(释放高度、生物量、叶面积、比叶面积、叶片干物质含量、F/F、表现指数、气孔孔表面积和气孔孔面积指数)来评估iFD。生境内非生物异质性源自海拔、坡向、坡度、叶面积指数、土壤深度及其他土壤因子。基于微卫星,我们计算了期望杂合度(H),因为在其他指标中它对iFD的解释力最强。我们进行了多元线性回归模型,以量化iFD、生境内非生物异质性和遗传多样性之间的关系,以及单独功能性状与生境内非生物异质性或遗传多样性之间的关系。我们发现,生境内非生物异质性对iFD的影响强度是遗传多样性的两倍。这两个方面共同解释了iFD变异的77%(R² = 0.77,F = 21.66,P < 0.001)。大多数功能性状(释放高度、生物量、比叶面积、叶片干物质含量、F/F和表现指数)与非生物生境条件相关,表明对环境异质性的响应。相比之下,只有与形态相关的功能性状(释放高度、生物量和叶面积)与遗传相关。我们的结果表明,生境内异质性和遗传多样性均影响iFD,因此在旨在理解或预测不断变化的环境条件下植物物种表现的变化时,必须予以考虑。