Sozinov A A, Laukka S, Lyashchenko A I, Siipo A, Nopanen M, Tuominen T, Alexandrov Yu I
V.B. Shvyrkov Lab. Neural Bases of Mind, Institute of Psychology RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Faculty of Psychology, State Academic University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia.
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 9;6(6):e04158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04158. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Classification of behavior into principal categories of approach and avoidance is grounded in evolutionary considerations and multiple results of behavioral, self-report, and brain-activity analyses. Contrasted via measures of cognitive processes, avoidance is accompanied by greater cognitive engagement than approach. Considering outcome as a key constituent of behavioral underpinnings, we interpret approach/avoidance distinction in terms of structure of experience: avoidance domain provides more detailed interaction with the environment, than approach domain. Learning outwardly similar behaviors aimed at gain or loss outcomes manifests formation of different structures that underlie further learning. Therefore, we predicted difference of learning transfer between gain and loss contexts that was revealed here by introducing two tasks for different groups of schoolchildren in Finland and Russia. The cultural specificity of gain/loss differences was also evident with employed measures, including error rate and post-error slowing. The results support that avoidance-motivated behavior is organized as a more complex organism-environment interaction, than the approach-motivated behavior.
将行为分为主要的趋近和回避类别,这基于进化考量以及行为、自我报告和大脑活动分析的多种结果。通过认知过程的测量进行对比,回避比趋近伴随着更高的认知参与度。将结果视为行为基础的关键组成部分,我们从经验结构的角度来解释趋近/回避的区别:回避领域比趋近领域提供了与环境更详细的互动。学习表面上相似但旨在获得或失去结果的行为,会表现出不同结构的形成,这些结构是进一步学习的基础。因此,我们预测了在得失情境之间学习迁移的差异,这一差异在此通过为芬兰和俄罗斯不同组别的学童引入两项任务得以揭示。得失差异的文化特异性在采用的测量方法中也很明显,包括错误率和错误后反应减慢。结果支持,与趋近动机行为相比,回避动机行为被组织成一种更复杂的有机体 - 环境互动。