Kathleen Bachynski is with the Public Health Program at Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA. Alison Bateman-House is with the Division of Medical Ethics and the Department of Population Health at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1198-1204. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
This article examines the origins and context of mandatory bicycle helmet laws in the United States. Localities began to enact such laws in the early 1990s, having experimented with helmet laws for motorcycles previously. As cycling became increasingly popular in the 1970s and 1980s because of a variety of historical trends, from improved cycle technology to growing environmental consciousness, cycling-related injuries also increased. Bicycle safety advocates and researchers alike were particularly troubled by head injuries. National injury surveillance systems and a growing body of medical literature on bicycle-related injuries motivated a number of physicians, cyclists, children, and other community members to advocate helmet laws, which they argued would save lives. Controversy over these laws, particularly over whether they should apply universally or only to children, raised public health ethics concerns that persist in contemporary debates over bicycle helmet policies. ( 2020;110:1198-1204. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718).
本文探讨了美国强制性自行车头盔法的起源和背景。在 20 世纪 90 年代早期,地方政府开始颁布此类法律,此前曾尝试过摩托车头盔法。由于各种历史趋势,如自行车技术的改进和日益增强的环保意识,自行车在 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代变得越来越流行,随之而来的是与自行车相关的受伤人数也在增加。自行车安全倡导者和研究人员都特别关注头部受伤问题。国家伤害监测系统和越来越多的关于自行车相关伤害的医学文献促使许多医生、骑自行车的人、儿童和其他社区成员倡导头盔法,他们认为这将拯救生命。这些法律引起了争议,特别是关于它们是否应该普遍适用还是只适用于儿童,引发了公共卫生伦理方面的关注,这些关注在当代关于自行车头盔政策的辩论中仍然存在。(2020 年;110:1198-1204.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718)。