Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349, Oslo, Norway.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
If all cyclistswere wearing helmets, significant numbers of head injuries might theoretically be prevented. Mandatory bicycle helmet legislation increases helmet use but is a controversial measure. Results from 21 studies of the effects of mandatory bicycle helmet legislation on injuries among crash involved cyclists were investigated by means of meta-analysis and the effects of several potential biases were investigated. The summary effect of mandatory bicycle helmet legislation for all cyclists on head injuries is a statistically significant reduction by 20% (95% confidence interval [-27; -13]). Larger effects were found for serious head injury (-55%; 95% confidence interval; [-78; -8]). Among children, larger effects were found when legislation applies to all cyclists than when it applies to children only. There is no clear indication of the results being affected by publication bias. Publication bias may exist, but any existing biases seem to more or less outweigh each other. Results from meta-analysis do not indicate that the results are systematically affected by a lack of control for time trend bias, choice of comparison group or study design (before-after vs. case control). Summary effects may be somewhat overestimated because of a lack of control for potential confounding variables in some of the studies. However, such a bias, if it exists, is not likely to be large. Empirical evidence for the hypotheses that mandatory bicycle helmet legislation deters people from cycling and that helmet wearing leads to behavioral adaptation is mixed. In summary, mandatory bicycle helmet legislation can be expected to reduce head injury among crash involved cyclists. Some adverse effects may occur, but will not necessarily be large or long-lasting. People who may be deterred from cycling, are among those with the highest injury risk and the smallest health effects from cycling. If the overall goal is to improve safety for all cyclists and to increase cycling, mandatory bicycle helmet legislation should be supplemented by other measures, especially improved bicycle infrastructure.
如果所有骑自行车的人都戴头盔,理论上可能会减少许多头部受伤的情况。强制性自行车头盔法规增加了头盔的使用,但这是一项有争议的措施。通过荟萃分析研究了 21 项关于强制性自行车头盔法规对涉及事故的自行车骑手受伤影响的研究结果,并研究了几种潜在偏差的影响。强制性自行车头盔法规对所有骑自行车的人的头部伤害的综合影响是统计学上显著减少 20%(95%置信区间[-27; -13])。严重头部受伤的效果更大(-55%;95%置信区间[-78; -8])。对于儿童,当法规适用于所有骑自行车的人而不是仅适用于儿童时,效果更大。没有明确的迹象表明结果受到发表偏倚的影响。可能存在发表偏倚,但任何现有偏差似乎或多或少相互抵消。荟萃分析的结果表明,由于缺乏对时间趋势偏差、对照组选择或研究设计(前后对比与病例对照)的控制,结果不会系统地受到影响。由于一些研究中缺乏对潜在混杂变量的控制,汇总效果可能会有些高估。但是,如果存在这种偏差,它也不太可能很大。强制性自行车头盔法规会阻止人们骑自行车,以及戴头盔会导致行为适应的假设的经验证据是混杂的。总之,强制性自行车头盔法规可以预期会减少涉及事故的自行车骑手的头部受伤。可能会出现一些不利影响,但不一定很大或持久。那些可能因头盔法规而不愿骑车的人,正是那些受伤风险最高、骑车健康收益最小的人。如果总体目标是提高所有自行车骑手的安全性并增加骑车人数,强制性自行车头盔法规应辅以其他措施,尤其是改善自行车基础设施。