• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理创新团队中的组织约束:四个卫生系统的定性研究。

Managing Organizational Constraints in Innovation Teams: A Qualitative Study Across Four Health Systems.

机构信息

Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):521-536. doi: 10.1177/1077558720925993. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1177/1077558720925993
PMID:32552540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8483614/
Abstract

Though increasingly useful for developing complex healthcare innovations, interdisciplinary teams are prone to resistance and other organizational challenges. However, how teams are affected by and manage external constraints over the lifecycle of their innovation project is not well understood. We used a multimethod qualitative approach consisting of over 3 years of participant observation data to analyze how four interdisciplinary teams across different health systems experienced and managed constraints as they pursued process innovations. Specifically, we derived the constraint management process, which demonstrates how teams address constraints at different stages of innovation by applying various tactics. Our findings point to several practical implications concerning innovation processes in healthcare: (a) how conditions in the organizational context, or constraints, can impede team progress at different stages of innovation; and (2) the collective efforts, or tactics, teams use to manage or work around these constraints to further progress on their innovations.

摘要

尽管跨学科团队在开发复杂的医疗保健创新方面越来越有用,但它们容易受到抵制和其他组织挑战的影响。然而,团队如何在创新项目的生命周期中受到外部限制的影响以及如何管理这些限制,目前还不是很清楚。我们采用了一种多方法定性方法,包括超过 3 年的参与式观察数据,来分析四个不同医疗系统的跨学科团队在追求流程创新时如何经历和管理限制。具体来说,我们得出了约束管理过程,该过程展示了团队如何通过应用各种策略来解决创新不同阶段的约束。我们的研究结果指出了医疗保健创新过程中的几个实际意义:(a) 组织环境中的条件(或约束)如何在创新的不同阶段阻碍团队的进展;以及 (2) 团队为管理或解决这些约束以进一步推进创新而使用的集体努力(或策略)。

相似文献

1
Managing Organizational Constraints in Innovation Teams: A Qualitative Study Across Four Health Systems.管理创新团队中的组织约束:四个卫生系统的定性研究。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):521-536. doi: 10.1177/1077558720925993. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Engaging Interdisciplinary Innovation Teams in Federally Qualified Health Centers.参与联邦合格健康中心的跨学科创新团队。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Oct;81(5):370-383. doi: 10.1177/10775587241235244. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3
Evaluating a patient safety learning laboratory to create an interdisciplinary ecosystem for health care innovation.评估患者安全学习实验室,为医疗创新创建跨学科生态系统。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(3):E50-E61. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000330. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
4
Process antecedents of challenging, under-cover and readily-adopted innovations.探索具有挑战性、隐蔽性和易于采用的创新的前置过程。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(1):42-63. doi: 10.1108/14777261311311799.
5
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.
6
Interdisciplinary team working in the Irish primary healthcare system: Analysis of 'invisible' bottom up innovations using Normalisation Process Theory.爱尔兰初级医疗保健系统中的跨学科团队合作:使用常规化进程理论分析“隐形”自下而上的创新。
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1083-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control.当用户不是决策者时:从利益相关者参与感染控制技术采用决策中学习。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Jul;81(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: using a case study approach and mixed methods.应用社会创新理论审视社区共同设计的卫生服务如何发展:采用案例研究方法和混合研究方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0.
9
The work of local healthcare innovation: a qualitative study of GP-led integrated diabetes care in primary health care.地方医疗保健创新工作:对基层医疗中由全科医生主导的综合糖尿病护理的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 14;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1270-4.
10
Project ECHO: a global cross-sectional examination of implementation success.“回音项目”:实施成功的全球横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 3;24(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10920-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining team creativity in primary care.审视基层医疗中的团队创造力。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2025 Aug 8;50(4):315-26. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000455.
2
Perspectives on managing innovation readiness in long-term care: a Q-methodology study.长期护理中管理创新准备度的观点:一项Q方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1017. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05572-3.
3
Revolutionising health and social care: innovative solutions for a brighter tomorrow - a systematic review of the literature.革新卫生和社会保健服务:开创美好明天的创新解决方案——文献系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11099-5.
4
Engaging Interdisciplinary Innovation Teams in Federally Qualified Health Centers.参与联邦合格健康中心的跨学科创新团队。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Oct;81(5):370-383. doi: 10.1177/10775587241235244. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Factors contributing to innovation readiness in health care organizations: a scoping review.促进医疗机构创新准备度的因素:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08185-x.
6
Implementing a COVID-19 Virtual Observation Unit in Emergency Medicine: Frontline Clinician and Staff Experiences.在急诊医学中实施 COVID-19 虚拟观察单元:一线临床医生和工作人员的经验。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Feb;80(1):79-91. doi: 10.1177/10775587221108750. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Centralization and innovation: Competing priorities for health systems?集中化与创新:卫生系统的竞争优先事项?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Sep;37(5):2534-2541. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3531. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
8
Evaluating a patient safety learning laboratory to create an interdisciplinary ecosystem for health care innovation.评估患者安全学习实验室,为医疗创新创建跨学科生态系统。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(3):E50-E61. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000330. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration.共同努力。一项关于医疗保健专业人员如何促进专业间合作的系统评价。
J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):332-342. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
It's Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt.还是价格问题:美国医疗保健支出为何如此之高——纪念乌韦·赖因哈特。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):87-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05144.
3
Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: The role of organizations, teams, and individuals.影响基层医疗质量改进实施的背景因素:组织、团队和个人的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jul/Sep;43(3):261-269. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000194.
4
Funding Innovation in a Learning Health Care System.学习型医疗保健系统中的资助创新
JAMA. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):119-120. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18205.
5
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
6
Improving the Context Supporting Quality Improvement in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Quality Collaborative: An Exploratory Field Study.改善新生儿重症监护病房质量协作中支持质量改进的背景:一项探索性实地研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):313-321. doi: 10.1177/1062860616644323. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
8
Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence.作为影响因素的个性与组织文化
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):702-10. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.702.
9
Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research.利用反思性优化定性研究中的团队协作。
Qual Health Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):26-44. doi: 10.1177/104973299129121677.