Suppr超能文献

基于社区的抗生素获取和使用在六个低收入和中等收入国家:混合方法研究。

Community-based antibiotic access and use in six low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-method approach.

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Department of Family Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e610-e619. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00024-3. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial misuse is common in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), and this practice is a driver of antibiotic resistance. We compared community-based antibiotic access and use practices across communities in LMICs to identify contextually specific targets for interventions to improve antibiotic use practices.

METHODS

We did quantitative and qualitative assessments of antibiotic access and use in six LMICs across Africa (Mozambique, Ghana, and South Africa) and Asia (Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Thailand) over a 2·5-year study period (July 1, 2016-Dec 31, 2018). We did quantitative assessments of community antibiotic access and use through supplier mapping, customer exit interviews, and household surveys. These quantitative assessments were triangulated with qualitative drug supplier and consumer interviews and discussions.

FINDINGS

Vietnam and Bangladesh had the largest proportions of non-licensed antibiotic dispensing points. For mild illness, drug stores were the most common point of contact when seeking antibiotics in most countries, except South Africa and Mozambique, where public facilities were most common. Self-medication with antibiotics was found to be widespread in Vietnam (55·2% of antibiotics dispensed without prescription), Bangladesh (45·7%), and Ghana (36·1%), but less so in Mozambique (8·0%), South Africa (1·2%), and Thailand (3·9%). Self-medication was considered to be less time consuming, cheaper, and overall, more convenient than accessing them through health-care facilities. Factors determining where treatment was sought often involved relevant policies, trust in the supplier and the drug, disease severity, and whether the antibiotic was intended for a child. Confusion regarding how to identify oral antibiotics was revealed in both Africa and Asia.

INTERPRETATION

Contextual complexities and differences between countries with different incomes, policy frameworks, and cultural norms were revealed. These contextual differences render a single strategy inadequate and instead necessitate context-tailored, integrated intervention packages to improve antibiotic use in LMICs as part of global efforts to combat antibiotic resistance.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust and Volkswagen Foundation.

摘要

背景

在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),抗菌药物的滥用十分常见,而这种做法是导致抗生素耐药性的一个驱动因素。我们比较了 LMICs 中不同社区的基于社区的抗生素获取和使用情况,以确定有针对性的具体干预措施,从而改善抗生素使用实践。

方法

在 2.5 年的研究期间(2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日),我们在非洲(莫桑比克、加纳和南非)和亚洲(孟加拉国、越南和泰国)的六个 LMICs 中进行了抗生素获取和使用的定量和定性评估。我们通过供应商映射、客户出口访谈和家庭调查对社区抗生素获取和使用进行了定量评估。这些定量评估与定性的药物供应商和消费者访谈和讨论进行了三角测量。

发现

越南和孟加拉国有最大比例的无执照抗生素配给点。对于轻度疾病,在大多数国家,药店是寻求抗生素时最常见的接触点,南非和莫桑比克除外,在这两个国家,公共设施最为常见。在越南(55.2%的抗生素未经处方配给)、孟加拉国(45.7%)和加纳(36.1%),我们发现抗生素的自我用药十分普遍,但在莫桑比克(8.0%)、南非(1.2%)和泰国(3.9%)则不然。自我用药被认为比通过医疗保健设施获得抗生素更省时、更便宜、总体上更方便。决定在哪里寻求治疗的因素通常涉及相关政策、对供应商和药物的信任、疾病严重程度以及抗生素是否用于儿童。在非洲和亚洲,都发现了对如何识别口服抗生素的困惑。

解释

揭示了不同收入、政策框架和文化规范的国家之间存在的复杂的、有差异的背景。这些背景差异表明,单一的策略是不够的,相反,需要针对具体情况的综合干预措施包,以改善 LMICs 中的抗生素使用,作为全球对抗抗生素耐药性努力的一部分。

资金

惠康信托基金会和大众汽车基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71cc/8050200/7d32befdf7ca/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验