• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估墨西哥实施小组产前护理过程中的保真度。

Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico.

机构信息

Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Department of ObGyn & Reproductive Sciences, UCSF/SFGH, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z
PMID:32552889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7301482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a group antenatal care (G-ANC) model that has proven beneficial for mothers and their newborns. We conducted a feasibility study beginning in 2016 as part of the Mexican effort to implement G-ANC locally. This study reports on fidelity to the essential elements of CP during its implementation in Mexico.

METHODS

We collected prospective data using a standardized checklist at four primary-care centers that implemented our adapted G-ANC model. We performed a descriptive analysis of fidelity to 28 processes per G-ANC session (71 sessions made up of 10 groups and 129 women across 4 health centers). We calculated fidelity to each process as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. We present overall results and stratified by health center and by facilitation team.

RESULTS

Overall fidelity to the G-ANC intervention was 82%, with variability by health center (78-88%). The elements with the highest fidelity were having space for activities such as checking vital signs, conversation in a circle, and medical check-ups (100% each) and the element with the lowest fidelity was using music to enhance privacy (27.3%). Fidelity was not significantly different by center.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests good model fidelity during the implementation of G-ANC in Mexico. Our findings also contribute useful information about where to focus efforts in the future to maintain and improve G-ANC model fidelity.

摘要

背景

核心孕期护理(CenteringPregnancy,CP)是一种群体产前护理(Group antenatal care,G-ANC)模式,已被证明对母亲及其新生儿有益。我们于 2016 年开始进行了一项可行性研究,作为墨西哥在当地实施 G-ANC 的努力的一部分。本研究报告了在墨西哥实施 CP 过程中对其基本要素的忠实程度。

方法

我们在四家实施我们改编的 G-ANC 模式的基层医疗中心使用标准化清单收集前瞻性数据。我们对每个 G-ANC 会议的 28 个流程(由 10 个小组和 4 个医疗中心的 129 名女性组成的 71 个会议)的忠实度进行了描述性分析。我们将每个流程的忠实度计算为比例,并给出 95%置信区间。我们呈现了总体结果,并按医疗中心和促进团队进行了分层。

结果

G-ANC 干预的总体忠实度为 82%,各医疗中心之间存在差异(78%-88%)。忠实度最高的元素是为活动(如检查生命体征、圆圈对话和医疗检查)提供空间(每个元素的忠实度为 100%),而忠实度最低的元素是使用音乐来增强隐私(27.3%)。中心之间的忠实度没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,在墨西哥实施 G-ANC 期间,该模式具有较好的忠实度。我们的研究结果还提供了有关未来在何处集中精力以保持和提高 G-ANC 模式忠实度的有用信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/2c917f568122/12913_2020_5430_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/db726b81c1ac/12913_2020_5430_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/03d716d37f1b/12913_2020_5430_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/2c917f568122/12913_2020_5430_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/db726b81c1ac/12913_2020_5430_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/03d716d37f1b/12913_2020_5430_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87e/7301482/2c917f568122/12913_2020_5430_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico.评估墨西哥实施小组产前护理过程中的保真度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z.
2
Utilizing a mixed-methods approach to assess implementation fidelity of a group antenatal care trial in Rwanda.采用混合方法评估卢旺达群组产前护理试验的实施保真度。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0288974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288974. eCollection 2023.
3
CenteringPregnancy-Africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development Goals.非洲孕期关爱中心:一项旨在实现千年发展目标的团体产前护理试点项目。
Midwifery. 2013 Oct;29(10):1190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
Timeliness, frequency and content of antenatal care: which is most important to reducing indigenous disparities in birth weight in Mexico?产前护理的及时性、频率和内容:哪一项对减少墨西哥本土出生体重差异最为重要?
Health Policy Plan. 2016 May;31(4):444-53. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv082. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal.测量一致性、可行性和成本:尼泊尔农村地区群组产前护理的群组对照试验的实施评估。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4.
6
Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of group antenatal care in Senegalese health posts: a pilot implementation trial.群体产前护理在塞内加尔卫生站的可行性和初步效果:一项试点实施试验。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Jun 1;35(5):587-599. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz178.
7
Does antenatal care service quality influence essential newborn care (ENC) practices? In Bahir Dar City Administration, North West Ethiopia: a prospective follow up study.产前护理服务质量是否会影响基本新生儿护理(ENC)的实施?在埃塞俄比亚西北巴希尔达市行政区:一项前瞻性随访研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Aug 29;44(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0544-3.
8
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
9
Exploring perceptions of group antenatal Care in Urban India: results of a feasibility study.探索印度城市群体产前护理的认知:一项可行性研究的结果。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 3;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0498-3.
10
Effect of group versus individual antenatal care on uptake of intermittent prophylactic treatment of malaria in pregnancy and related malaria outcomes in Nigeria and Kenya: analysis of data from a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.群组与个体产前护理对尼日利亚和肯尼亚孕妇间歇性预防治疗疟疾的接受率和相关疟疾结局的影响:一项实用型群组随机试验的数据分析。
Malar J. 2020 Jan 29;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3099-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.群体产前护理积极改变护理体验:马拉维一项有效性试验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.
2
Facilitated group care for maternal and child health model fidelity: A scoping review.母婴健康模式保真度的促进性团体护理:一项范围综述。
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2517788. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2517788. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
Qualitative evaluation of a package of implementation strategies codesigned to support the introduction of multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) for pregnant women in Bamako, Mali.

本文引用的文献

1
Group prenatal care: effectiveness and challenges to implementation.群体产前保健:效果及实施面临的挑战。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Sep 30;53:85. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001303. eCollection 2019.
2
The Mexican Experience Adapting CenteringPregnancy: Lessons Learned in a Publicly Funded Health Care System Serving Vulnerable Women.墨西哥适应“以孕妇为中心”模式的经验:在为弱势妇女提供公共资助医疗保健系统中汲取的教训
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Sep 10;63(5):602-10. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12891.
3
Group antenatal care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic evidence synthesis.
对一套共同设计的实施策略进行定性评估,这些策略旨在支持在马里巴马科为孕妇引入多种微量营养素补充剂(MMS)。
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jan;21(1):e13712. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13712. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Couples' perceptions and experience of smartphone-assisted CenteringPregnancy model in southeast of China: a dyadic analysis of qualitative study.中国东南部夫妇对智能手机辅助围产保健模式的认知和体验:一项基于对偶分析的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):e079121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079121.
5
Utilizing a mixed-methods approach to assess implementation fidelity of a group antenatal care trial in Rwanda.采用混合方法评估卢旺达群组产前护理试验的实施保真度。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0288974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288974. eCollection 2023.
中低收入国家的群体产前保健模式:系统证据综合。
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 5;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0476-9.
4
Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings: managing tensions in rehabilitation care.多学科环境中健康促进计划的实施保真度轨迹:管理康复护理中的紧张关系。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 1;12(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0667-8.
5
Group prenatal care.群体产前保健。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):552-556. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
[Gaps in the continuum of care during pregnancy and delivery in Mexico].[墨西哥孕期及分娩期间连续护理的差距]
Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S249-58.
7
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.动态可持续性框架:应对持续变化中的维持悖论。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 2;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
8
Assessing fidelity of delivery of smoking cessation behavioural support in practice.评估实践中戒烟行为支持提供的保真度。
Implement Sci. 2013 Apr 4;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-40.
9
Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes.群体产前保健:模式保真度和结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;209(2):112.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure.实施保真度:度量的开发和测试。
Implement Sci. 2010 Dec 30;5:99. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-99.