Neuroscience Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and Physiology and
Neuroscience Institute and Departments of Neuroscience and Physiology and.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;40(30):5709-5723. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0830-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
The paranodal junctions flank mature nodes of Ranvier and provide a barrier between ion channels at the nodes and juxtaparanodes. These junctions also promote node assembly and maintenance by mechanisms that are poorly understood. Here, we examine their role in the accumulation of NF186, a key adhesion molecule of PNS and CNS nodes. We previously showed that NF186 is initially targeted/accumulates via its ectodomain to forming PNS (hemi)nodes by diffusion trapping, whereas it is later targeted to mature nodes by a transport-dependent mechanism mediated by its cytoplasmic segment. To address the role of the paranodes in this switch, we compared accumulation of NF186 ectodomain and cytoplasmic domain constructs in WT versus paranode defective (i.e., Caspr-null) mice. Both pathways are affected in the paranodal mutants. In the PNS of Caspr-null mice, diffusion trapping mediated by the NF186 ectodomain aberrantly persists into adulthood, whereas the cytoplasmic domain/transport-dependent targeting is impaired. In contrast, accumulation of NF186 at CNS nodes does not undergo a switch; it is predominantly targeted to both forming and mature CNS nodes via its cytoplasmic domain and requires intact paranodes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis indicates that the paranodes provide a membrane diffusion barrier that normally precludes diffusion of NF186 to nodes. Linkage of paranodal proteins to the underlying cytoskeleton likely contributes to this diffusion barrier based on 4.1B and βII spectrin expression in Caspr-null mice. Together, these results implicate the paranodes as membrane diffusion barriers that regulate targeting to nodes and highlight differences in the assembly of PNS and CNS nodes. Nodes of Ranvier are essential for effective saltatory conduction along myelinated axons. A major question is how the various axonal proteins that comprise the multimeric nodal complex accumulate at this site. Here we examine how targeting of NF186, a key nodal adhesion molecule, is regulated by the flanking paranodal junctions. We show that the transition from diffusion-trapping to transport-dependent accumulation of NF186 requires the paranodal junctions. We also demonstrate that these junctions are a barrier to diffusion of axonal proteins into the node and highlight differences in PNS and CNS node assembly. These results provide new insights into the mechanism of node assembly and the pathophysiology of neurologic disorders in which impaired paranodal function contributes to clinical disability.
神经节旁结位于成熟的郎飞结两侧,为结间离子通道提供屏障,并将其与结周区隔开。这些结还通过机制促进结的组装和维持,但这些机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了它们在 NF186 积累中的作用,NF186 是 PNS 和 CNS 结的关键粘附分子。我们之前曾表明,NF186 的外显子最初通过扩散捕获靶向/积累到形成 PNS(半)结,而其细胞质片段介导的依赖运输的机制将其靶向成熟结。为了解决节旁区在这种转变中的作用,我们比较了 NF186 外显子和细胞质结构域构建体在 WT 与节旁区缺陷(即 Caspr 缺失)小鼠中的积累。这两种途径在节旁突变体中都受到影响。在 Caspr 缺失小鼠的 PNS 中,NF186 外显子介导的扩散捕获异常持续到成年期,而细胞质结构域/依赖运输的靶向则受损。相比之下,NF186 在 CNS 结中的积累不会发生转变;它主要通过其细胞质结构域靶向形成和成熟的 CNS 结,并需要完整的节旁区。光漂白后荧光恢复分析表明,节旁区提供了一个膜扩散屏障,通常阻止 NF186 扩散到结。基于 Caspr 缺失小鼠中 4.1B 和 βII spectrin 的表达,节旁蛋白与下面的细胞骨架的连接可能有助于这种扩散屏障。总之,这些结果表明节旁区作为膜扩散屏障,调节向结的靶向,并突出 PNS 和 CNS 结组装的差异。郎飞节是髓鞘轴突有效跳跃传导所必需的。一个主要问题是组成多聚体节复合的各种轴突蛋白如何在该部位积累。在这里,我们研究了 NF186(一种关键的节粘连分子)的靶向如何受侧翼节旁结的调节。我们表明,NF186 从扩散捕获到依赖运输的积累的转变需要节旁结。我们还证明这些结是轴突蛋白扩散进入结的屏障,并突出 PNS 和 CNS 结组装的差异。这些结果为节组装的机制以及节旁功能障碍导致临床残疾的神经疾病的病理生理学提供了新的见解。