Center for Hearing Research, Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Sciences, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
Center for Hearing Research, Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Sciences, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 29;40(31):6007-6017. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0396-20.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Tinnitus is a sound heard by 15% of the general population in the absence of any external sound. Because external sounds can sometimes mask tinnitus, tinnitus is assumed to affect the perception of external sounds, leading to hypotheses such as "tinnitus filling in the temporal gap" in animal models and "tinnitus inducing hearing difficulty" in human subjects. Here we compared performance in temporal, spectral, intensive, masking and speech-in-noise perception tasks between 45 human listeners with chronic tinnitus (18 females and 27 males with a range of ages and degrees of hearing loss) and 27 young, normal-hearing listeners without tinnitus (11 females and 16 males). After controlling for age, hearing loss, and stimulus variables, we discovered that, contradictory to the widely held assumption, tinnitus does not interfere with the perception of external sounds in 32 of the 36 measures. We interpret the present result to reflect a bottom-up pathway for the external sound and a separate top-down pathway for tinnitus. We propose that these two perceptual pathways can be independently modulated by attention, which leads to the asymmetrical interaction between external and internal sounds, and several other puzzling tinnitus phenomena such as discrepancy in loudness between tinnitus rating and matching. The present results suggest not only a need for new theories involving attention and central noise in animal tinnitus models but also a shift in focus from treating tinnitus to managing its comorbid conditions when addressing complaints about hearing difficulty in individuals with tinnitus. Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is a neurologic disorder that affects 15% of the general population. Here we discovered an asymmetrical relationship between tinnitus and external sounds: although external sounds have been widely used to cover up tinnitus, tinnitus does not impair, and sometimes even improves, the perception of external sounds. This counterintuitive discovery contradicts the general belief held by scientists, clinicians, and even individuals with tinnitus themselves, who often report hearing difficulty, especially in noise. We attribute the counterintuitive discovery to two independent pathways: the bottom-up perception of external sounds and the top-down perception of tinnitus. Clinically, the present work suggests a shift in focus from treating tinnitus itself to treating its comorbid conditions and secondary effects.
耳鸣是 15%的普通人群在没有任何外部声音的情况下听到的声音。由于外部声音有时可以掩盖耳鸣,因此人们假设耳鸣会影响对外界声音的感知,从而导致了一些假说,例如动物模型中的“耳鸣填补时间间隙”和人类受试者中的“耳鸣引起听力困难”。在这里,我们比较了 45 名慢性耳鸣患者(18 名女性和 27 名男性,年龄和听力损失程度不等)和 27 名年轻、听力正常的无耳鸣受试者(11 名女性和 16 名男性)在时间、频谱、强度、掩蔽和语音噪声感知任务中的表现。在控制年龄、听力损失和刺激变量后,我们发现与广泛持有的假设相反,在 36 项测量中的 32 项中,耳鸣并没有干扰对外界声音的感知。我们将这一结果解释为反映了外部声音的自下而上途径和耳鸣的独立的自上而下途径。我们提出,这两个感知途径可以通过注意力独立调节,从而导致外部和内部声音之间的不对称相互作用,以及其他一些令人困惑的耳鸣现象,例如耳鸣评级和匹配之间的响度差异。这些结果不仅表明需要在动物耳鸣模型中引入涉及注意力和中枢噪声的新理论,而且在解决耳鸣患者听力困难的抱怨时,需要从治疗耳鸣转向管理其合并症。耳鸣,即耳朵嗡嗡声,是一种影响 15%普通人群的神经系统疾病。在这里,我们发现了耳鸣和外部声音之间的不对称关系:尽管外部声音被广泛用于掩盖耳鸣,但耳鸣不会损害,有时甚至会改善,对外界声音的感知。这一违背直觉的发现与科学家、临床医生甚至耳鸣患者自己的普遍看法相矛盾,他们经常报告听力困难,尤其是在噪音中。我们将这一违背直觉的发现归因于两个独立的途径:外部声音的自下而上感知和耳鸣的自上而下感知。临床上,目前的工作表明,注意力从治疗耳鸣本身转移到治疗其合并症和继发效应。